Unless this investigator used common sense (The lack of footprints and the ransom note being in Patsy's handwriting means the story of there being an outside intruder is false), anything he said means absolute squat to those capable of rational thought.
What you interpret as lack of cooperation from the Ramseys might be their lawyer's advice so that they wouldn't be railroaded into jail.
What baloney. If you are accused of something you did not do, you do whatever it takes to prove you are innocent. You don't promptly leave the state and then demand any and all questions investigators may ask be posed in advance, in writing. That might work in a parallel world, but we are not living on one and neither are they.
It was my understanding that they couldn't prove the note was written by Patsy but they couldn't count it out although they could count out John Ramsey as having written it.
Another load of nonsense. An independent handwriting expert concluded the writing on the note almost definitively matched Patsy's. I cannot believe you did not hear about this. I am sure you know how to read a newspaper.
Guess where they buried Jon Benet? It wasn't in CO.
There weren't any prints because the walk ways were cleared. They had cement walk ways around alot of the house including going by that basement window.
There *was* evidence of someone breaking in through that small basement window and leaving marks on the wall and items below it.
And there *was* a hair found on Jon Benet that doesn't match any of her family, even those not known to be in Co at the time. IIRC, it was a pubic hair.
All of this does negate Snapple's theory.