[Freedom Dignity n Honor]

Also, you are going by the word of *one* investigator? Try a preponderance of the evidence AND read more or listen to more than just one investigator.

There weren't any prints because the walk ways were cleared. They had cement walk ways around alot of the house including going by that basement window.

There *was* evidence of someone breaking in through that small basement window and leaving marks on the wall and items below it.

And there *was* a hair found on Jon Benet that doesn't match any of her family, even those not known to be in Co at the time. IIRC, it was a pubic hair.

All of this does negate Snapple's theory.

[Freedom Dignity n Honor]

Snapple,

I'm sorry.. that should read, "None of this negates Snapple's theory" or "All of this does not negate Snapple's theory."

[SouthernFreebird]

You are very far behind in this case. There was NO pubic hair. It was a body hair and it belonged to one of the Ramseys. Melinda I believe. It's been so long ago that I've forgotten the specifics.