Posted on 01/29/2005 3:57:06 PM PST by cicero's_son
I'm hoping for some good advice from fellow Freepers about which handgun to purchase.
I'm a novice shooter (with handguns at least). Don't really know very much about them. I've applied for a conceal carry permit in Indiana, and I'm signed up for the next NRA basic education classes at the local range.
This will be my first (and possibly only) small sidearm purchase. I don't want or need anything too heavy-duty. Just a reliable, effective, easy to use, accurate pistol for personal and home defense.
I'm leaning toward a Glock 9mm, but I understand there is a wide divergence of opinion on them.
What say you?
PING!
Ms.B
GLOCK 27
Caliber: .40
GLOCK 27
Caliber .40
Action Safe Action System
Length (slide) 6.29 in. 160 mm
Height 2) 4.17 in. 106 mm
Width 1.18 in. 30 mm
Length between sights 3) 5.67 in. 144 mm
Barrel length 3.46 in. 88 mm
Barrel rifling right, hexagonal
Length of twist 9.84 in. 250 mm
Magazine capacity 4) 9 / 11
Mass (weight)
Empty without magazine 19.75 oz. 560 g
Empty magazine 2.12 oz. 60 g
Full magazine 5) ~7.23 oz. ~205 g
Trigger pull (standard) ~5.5 lbs. ~2.5 kg
Trigger travel for discharge 6) 0.5 in. 12.5 mm
Number of safeties 3
1) C: Compensated
2) Includes magazine and sight
3) With sight rear 6.5
4) Check local law and regulations.l
5) Depending on the used ammunition
6) Includes trigger safety
Everyone is different. First of all, if you want a big gun, you'll want a .45 or .40. Find out how much it weighs. My Colt Commander weighs about 37 oz, over two pounds. Get something the same weight and similar size and carry it on you for a week. It becomes heavy and not only that, its length makes it uncomfortable and difficult to conceal, and it unbalances your body.
Then there's your size, location and personality to consider.
Take your time. Take the course and ask the instructors. Hopefully they'll be reasonable.
I carry guns every day. Freepmail me if you want.
GLOCK 36 Specifications
Caliber .45 ACP
I do not approve of any Glock, for the obvious reasons.
I'm sure this concept has been FReeped to hell and back somewhere.
(Yes, I'll look it up.)
But Soviet Makarovs in 9x18mm are small, effective, cheap, dependable and accurate.
Maks simply dont jam or break and the fixed barrel is very accurate.
A lot of guys that used to tote heavy 45s and bulky glocks all day now carry Makarovs do to ease of concealment and effectivness
You might think so but the .40 has plenty of knockdown power. I owned a 9 MM Glock and liked the fact that a lot more power was available in the same medium sized pistol that fit my hand.
Do a Google search for "Strasbourg Tests". In that test several European police agencies did a test on live French Alpine goats of the same size and weight of the average human male to see which cartridge disabled a healthy goat in the shortest length of time. I think something like 600 goats were shot in the thorax with various popular handgun rounds, and the time interval between the shot and the animal's collapse was recorded to the tenth of a second and averaged out over a series of shots from each cartridge.
IIRC the .45acp did very well, but it wasn't the top "stopper". Again, IIRC, the .357 mag firing a 125 grain hollow point round took the top spot. Also IIRC, the 9mm came in with a very respectable score, not far behind the .45acp in fact.
For me personally I usually carry a Taurus medium frame 2-1/2" .357 revolver in a Don Hume belt slide holster, except in hot weather when I can't conceal it under a jacket or coat. In hot weather I have been carrying a commercial Russian Makarov .380 semiauto loaded with Federal HydroShok cartridges in a pocket holster, but I am planning to upgrade to a 9mm Springfield Armory XD Compact semiauto before summer weather returns. IMHO the .380 is just barely adequate for self defense, but at the time I bought it there were no truly small 9mm guns on the market and it was better than the little .32s.
If I were you I would check out the Springfield compact. It has everything going for it that the Glock model 26 has and it's quite a bit less expensive. Although I really like the old .45acp and have owned several 1911s and one S&W .45acp revolver, I believe anyone is quite well armed carrying a reliable 9mm loaded with good hollow point cartridges such as Corbons or Hydroshoks.
Oh yes.
It is also available now in .40 S&W caliber, but I wouldn't recommend such a lightweight (20 ounce) .40 caliber pistol to anyone who isn't quite familiar with heavy recoiling handguns. A 20 ounce pistol firing a 165 grain bullet at over 1100 fps is going to kick pretty darn hard, and if you aren't accustomed to that kind of recoil it can easily develop a bad flinching habit which ruins your accuracy and is very hard to overcome.
I know about flinching, because a Colt Lightweight Officer's Model .45acp caused me to acquire a flinch habit which I'm still bothered by at times. OTOH, I really enjoy shooting a heavy 8-3/8" Colt Anaconda .44 magnum, and it has no tendency to cause a flinch even though it's much more powerful than the .45. Little guns in big calibers are designed to carry a lot and shoot a little. But you need to practice regularly, and if your gun hurts you when you shoot it you won't practice enough.
The .45 GAP is built on the same frame and slide as the 9mm and the .40. The external dimensions are identical.
It has te same ballistics as the larger .45 auto.
So9
Thanks!
52 posts and not one mention of Beretta. Whazzup wit dat?
I carry a 92FS compact in 9mm and have a .380 bearcat that I can put in my pocket. Both well made and trouble free.
But then, that's just me.....
Hi, Sorry for the laet post but I couldn't find this one last night. Good Luck.
http://www.firearmstactical.com/briefs31.htm
I realize it's not an automatic, but I just checked out the Smith&Wesson 642 revolver today. I was pretty impressed.
It seemed like an ideal conceal carry weapon--lightweight and compact, very reliable, easy to use.
What do you guys think of it?
I don't know... Do you have small hands or something? Are you a woman? 642's are called the "Lady Smith". Again lok at Sig or HK :D
Reason I asked about the 642 was concealability.
Two things about a wheel gun. One, they're less fussy than semi-autos. You could toss it under your bed and pull it out years later and it'll still work . . . that's not likely to happen with a semi-auto.
Two, is they aren't slab guns, so finding a comfortable way to carry is a little tougher.
A new 642 is about $500 and a 60 is about $600, a full $100 more, plus the 60 is a lot heavier. It's a smart first gun, either the 642 or 60. The .38 special round is great for self defense.
I love caliber wars!!
In general...shot placement is much more important that bullet size. Doesn't really matter how power the cartridge, if you miss the target?
In other words!...A well-placed 9mm. is far superior to a well-missed .45 ACP.
Look at a variety of guns in various calibers and frame size. Feel, balance & control will be the deciding factor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.