Posted on 01/19/2005 9:51:40 AM PST by Mo1
I am wondering, since I don't know you very well...how old are your children? Are they still at home?
My step-daughter said I had an 'acid tongue' and a 'way with words' when it came to something she did wrong.
Thankfully, she knew where I was coming from and accepted the rebuke and didn't do whatever it was again.
Anyone who hurt her, learned that I was a nice guy only part of the time.
Her ex-boyfriend is still scared that I'll come looking for him.
Since my step-daughter died, I have no children.
So my friends get the over protective barrier between them and jerks.
A failing I have, admittedly.
"Dr. Jekyll - MR. Hide"
Yeah, I've been called that too.
*chuckle*
My oldest will be 20 in August; my youngest will be 17 next month. They lived with me, alone, since they were 4 and 7 until recently. When I moved to NY from CO, the older one moved to her dad's her senior year. He has close family living nearby. My youngest just moved there last summer.
And I miss them both horribly.
Yes, it is terrible to miss your children. But, guess what, they will be back. I have learned that the empty nest has a revolving door. LOL
Really! like a light switch sometimes! : )
****
More like faulty wiring you never know when it is going to blow a fuse!!!!!! LOL
Men: NOT UL listed.
Men: NOT UL listed
*****
Dark your covered your a Highlander!:)
Forever here inside of me
All alone and afraid to see
Never thought this would be
All alone inside of me
I hunger for a hint of light
Wander through my endless night
Have so little left to give this fight
Lost, alone, for want of light
Forever here inside of me
Where shadows all there is to see
Sometimes wish that I could flee
The shadows here inside of me
Tossed me out into the sky
Pierced by arrows of her lies
Tears that sting my glittering eyes
Falling alone in the stormy sky
Forever here inside of me
All alone and cannot see
What there is and cannot be
Forever alone, forever me
............................................................
Thank you all, pleasant dreams, and good evening...
you guys are going to get me into trouble; i just posted a wrong response to a serious thread!!!
LOL!
Hmm..
Yeah, I'd forgotten about that.
;-)
Been way too long since I last spoke to Maxie and the gang.
Sorry!
And with that, I really AM outta here..
*Shuffles out side door*
Have a good night
Tip toeing to your crypt!
I know they'll be back...it's just difficult not seeing them on a daily basis right now.
nighty night!
You too, pleasant dreams.
CBS
Please do not link to printable views of stories. The full story can be accessed using the link below. Thank you.
http://kyw.com/Local%20News/local_story_028223622.html
CBS 3 | kyw.com
Exclusive: Contaminated Money
Jan 28, 2005 11:00 pm US/Eastern
Money that has been contaminated with a virus; it’s a whole new possible direction for bioterrorism. It is a case that the FBI terrorism unit has taken over from state police that involves several cities, including Philadelphia.
As CBS 3’s Tamsen Fadal reports, the unit is trying to determine whether or not a virus was actually placed over money to protect the interest of the Russian mob.
In an exclusive investigation, CBS 3 has obtained documents detailing a bizarre criminal plot involving a virus, suspected drug money, and the Russian mob in Northeast Philadelphia.
Earlier this month, Pennsylvania State Troopers intercepted $250,000 dollars during a routine traffic stop. The alleged drug money, which had been sealed in plastic, was being driven from Columbus, Ohio to Northeast Philadelphia.
According to law enforcement sources, after counting the seized cash, troopers began feeling ill and one trooper was even hospitalized with flu-like symptoms.
Sources tell CBS 3 that tests on the cash counter revealed the presence of a toxin derived from the bacteria staphylococcus.
Dr. Joseph Smith, a local terrorism expert says it may be a new application of terrorism, although this time it was used as a deterrent among thieves: “I am not that surprised, this is the nature of terrorism. By its nature, you have to say we must always be mindful and careful of new applications.”
However, Fadal says that when CBS inquired about the case, FBI Spokesperson Jerri Williams said “this is under investigation and we have no information to provide to the public at this time."
While law enforcement says there are no known instances where the toxin has been used with malicious intent, Dr. Smith says he would not be surprised if criminals are now employing some of the same tools as terrorists: “This is one of the unique natures of terrorism. It’s different than your conventional type of warfare.”
Fadal has learned that a warning has been issued at both the state and federal level, recommending that officers should take extra precaution and wear protective masks when handling suspected drug money, now more than ever.
© MMV, CBS Broadcasting Inc., All Rights Reserved.
February 9, 2005
Lesson of Clinton Fund-Raiser: Double-Check That Donor List
By RAYMOND HERNANDEZ and IAN URBINA
ASHINGTON, Feb. 8 - In August 2000, Bill and Hillary Clinton attended a Hollywood fund-raiser billed as a tribute to a president ready to leave the White House after eight years and a first lady seeking to establish herself as a force of her own in American politics.
The guest list reflected the glitter of the occasion: Cher, Diana Ross, Brad Pitt and Patti LaBelle, to name just a few. But a person who later emerged as perhaps the most memorable - to the Clintons and their associates, anyway - was a well-connected figure with a checkered past who helped organize the event. He is Peter Paul, a man who pleaded guilty to cocaine possession and trying to defraud Fidel Castro's government out of millions of dollars in 1979, among other things.
Mr. Paul said he spent nearly $2 million of his own on the fund-raiser as a way to curry favor with Mr. Clinton, and photographs show him chatting with Mr. Clinton at a dinner table, having a discussion with Mrs. Clinton and striking poses for the camera with both of them.
Associates of the Clintons say the couple did not know of Mr. Paul's troubled past at the time, and in the months after the event, Mr. Paul turned on the Clintons, later urging investigators to look into the fund-raiser.
Last month, the federal investigation produced an indictment charging that the cost of the affair had been underreported.
The case offers a bizarre and tangled tale of how Mr. Paul, a smooth operator with myriad connections and a troubled past, got so close to America's first couple in a political culture dominated by money. It also shows the continuing effort of a longtime nemesis of the Clintons, Judicial Watch, a conservative legal group, to make legal trouble for the couple.
A spokesman for the Justice Department, Bryan Sierra, said in a recent interview that Mrs. Clinton was not a subject of the investigation that led to the indictment, which named not Mr. Paul, but another person connected to the event, David Rosen, the finance director of Mrs. Clinton's Senate campaign, who is accused of underreporting the cost of the fund-raiser. No one else has been accused of any wrongdoing arising from the accusations.
Beyond that, people involved in Mrs. Clinton's 2000 campaign expressed bafflement at the indictment, not only noting that prosecutors had failed to state Mr. Rosen's motive but also arguing that Mr. Rosen did not, in fact, have a motive, since underreporting the contributions would not have produced any financial benefit for Mrs. Clinton's campaign under a complicated series of campaign-finance rules.
But one official at the Federal Election Commission disagreed, saying that there was a possible advantage to underreporting such contributions in a case like this: to have more money to spend on the campaign itself.
In addition, Clinton advisers say that Mrs. Clinton's campaign had no idea about Mr. Paul's troubled past until after the gala - and that Mr. Paul was involved only because of his association with a successful Internet company he started with the co-creator of Spider-Man, Stan Lee, who was listed as one of the co-hosts of the event. One Clinton adviser described Mr. Lee as "an American icon."
Mrs. Clinton's advisers referred questions to David Kendall, a lawyer for the Clintons. Mr. Kendall dismissed Mr. Paul's claim that a deal had been struck to have the President assist Mr. Paul in his business dealings provided that Mr. Paul raised money for Mrs. Clinton's campaign. "There was never any kind of quid pro quo," he said.
During an interview he gave to The New York Times in 2001, Mr. Rosen himself expressed bewilderment at how far Mr. Paul got. "I've never seen a guy like this," Mr. Rosen said. "I wish I'd never bumped into him in the first place." Mr. Rosen did not return two more recent phone calls requesting comment on the matter.
Mr. Paul's past is certainly colorful. Two decades ago, he served 42 months in federal prison and his law license was suspended after he pleaded guilty to cocaine possession and trying to defraud the Cuban government out of $8.7 million in a complicated scheme involving coffee sales to the Soviet Union from Cuba.
By 1999, Mr. Paul teamed up with Mr. Lee to create Stan Lee Media, a multimedia company based in the San Fernando Valley that, among other things, introduced animated superheroes on the Internet.
He got involved in Democratic politics afterward, donating money at the suggestion of Aaron Tonken, also a fund-raiser, who told him that that would be a good way to raise the profile of his company, according to Mr. Paul and his legal representatives at Judicial Watch, a conservative legal group that has dogged the Clintons for years and has been representing Mr. Paul. (Among the ideas Mr. Paul had was trying to get Mr. Clinton to serve on the board of his company, he said.)
It was then that Mr. Paul claims he began having discussions with Democratic operatives close to the Clintons, including Mr. Rosen, about how to get Mr. Clinton to help bolster the image of Stan Lee Media after he left office.
Mr. Paul claims that he was eventually told by Mr. Rosen and Jim Levin, a former Chicago strip club owner who was a major Clinton donor, that the best way to win favor with Mr. Clinton was to raise money for Mrs. Clinton's Senate campaign in New York. The idea for the fund-raiser was subsequently born.
"My motivation had nothing to do with getting Hillary elected senator," Mr. Paul said the other day in an interview from his home in North Carolina, where he is under house arrest in a separate case. "I could care less about that. My motivation was to do this as a favor to Bill to demonstrate my good faith."
By nearly any measure, the Aug. 12 fund-raiser Mr. Paul organized - billed as The Hollywood Gala Salute to William Jefferson Clinton - was a success. It drew some of the biggest names in the entertainment industry, including Gregory Peck, John Travolta, Melissa Etheridge and Muhammad Ali. And it raised more than $1 million, according to the indictment against Mr. Rosen.
It was such a popular affair that Democrats close to Al Gore, who was running for president at the time, complained that the Clintons were upstaging Mr. Gore at the same time he was set to be nominated at the Democratic National Convention in Los Angeles.
"It was the most spectacular event that I organized in my life," Mr. Tonken recalled in a telephone interview from federal prison, where he is serving a sentence for defrauding donors of charity events he organized. "I thought if I could pull this event off, it would be the highlight of my career."
Mr. Paul even has personal thank-you notes from both Clintons afterward, as well as photographs of him and the Clintons at the affair. Judicial Watch provided those items to The New York Times.
"Thank you so very much for hosting Saturday night's tribute to the President and for everything you did to make it the great occasion that it was," Mrs. Clinton said in a note to Mr. Paul dated Aug. 18, 2000. "We will remember it always."
But not long after the Aug. 12 event, Mrs. Clinton's campaign appeared to begin distancing itself from Mr. Paul as disclosures of his previous felony convictions surfaced publicly. On Aug. 16, a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton's campaign told The Washington Post that the campaign would return $2,000 in campaign donations that Mr. Paul had directly made.
Mr. Paul said he began having misgivings about the Clintons in the months after the event. "The knee-jerk reaction was to distance themselves from me when my 25-year-old record was exposed," he said in an interview. "This was something that I heard came from their press office. I don't know how much Mrs. Clinton was involved in the decision. But once they said they didn't know me, their flag was planted and they didn't have much wiggle room."
In early 2001, Stan Lee Media declared bankruptcy, according to Mr. Paul. Federal investigators soon began asking questions about the company's demise. Around that time, Mr. Paul boarded a plane to Brazil, where he says he had a home and a business.
(Eventually, in June 2001, Mr. Paul and three other men were indicted on charges that they inflated the stock of Stan Lee Media and then sold it for a profit. He was extradited to the United States in August 2001.)
Mr. Paul says that he went public with his concerns about financial matters involving Mr. Rosen and the Clinton campaign after discovering irregularities in the financial disclosure statements filed by the campaign. But allies of the Clintons say he made the accusations in an attempt to cut a deal with prosecutors investigating the financial improprieties at Stan Lee Media.
Mr. Paul's charges did not appear to go anywhere for years.
Then last month, federal prosecutors unsealed an indictment of Mr. Rosen by a grand jury in California, accusing him of falsely reporting that the August 2000 gala cost $401,419 when it actually cost at least $1.2 million. While the indictment does not mention Mr. Paul by name, it said the event was paid for with more than $1.1 million worth of "in-kind" contributions of goods and services from an unidentified donor.
As a professional fund-raiser and the chief finance director for the campaign, Mr. Rosen was responsible for all planning and costs for the event, according to the indictment. Mr. Rosen is also accused of obtaining and delivering a false invoice stating that the cost of the concert part of the event was $200,000, when in fact it actually cost more than $600,000, according to the indictment. Mr. Rosen faces four counts of lying to the election commission. Each count carries a penalty of up to five years in prison and up to $250,000 in fines upon conviction.
In an interview, Mr. Rosen's lawyer, Paul Sandler, would not discuss the case other than to say: "He's innocent and we will present our case in court." But in a 2001 interview with The New York Times, Mr. Rosen said that Mr. Paul was making the accusations against him and the Clinton campaign as "a way to get immunity" from the charges he might face in the investigation involving Stan Lee Media.
"He's a desperate man," Mr. Rosen said of Mr. Paul at the time.
He also said that since Mr. Paul had organized the event, it was up to him to disclose the costs of the event to campaign officials. "It's their responsibility to report the contributions," he said.
As for the event itself, Mr. Rosen acknowledged that it was "great," as he put it. "But I still think I need therapy for having dealt with these guys," he said, referring to Mr. Paul and his associates.
Even Mr. Paul's former associate, Mr. Tonken, says he believes that Mr. Paul's accusations against the Clintons were an attempt to cut a deal with federal investigators looking into the financial improprieties at Stan Lee Media. "I know David Rosen personally and he is a good person," Mr. Tonken said. "Paul knew that he had to give up Mrs. Clinton to save himself."
But Mr. Paul, who said he was cooperating with investigators, is sticking to his story. "I came forward as soon as I found out that my contribution hadn't been reported at all," he said.
Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy | Search | Corrections | RSS | Help | Back to Top
Phones, Car Engines Face Security Threats -- Report
Feb 9, 12:13 AM (ET)
Debt Consolidation - Reduce Payments by 75% No Cost or Obligation!
www.DebtConsolidation.com
By Eric Auchard
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Daily computer security headaches such as viruses and spam threaten to spread to a far wider range of devices -- from phones to car engines, a survey to be published by IBM on Wednesday has found.
The report, published by IBM Security Intelligence Services, a consulting arm of the world's largest computer company, paints a picture of rampant, albeit controllable, security dangers.
The survey combines data from big business customers, government security statistics and observations from some 2,000 IBM security consultants, detailing the proliferation of computer security threats in 2004 and likely next moves.
Watch out for viruses that spread to mobile phones, handheld computers, wireless networks and embedded computers which are increasingly used to run basic automobile functions, the 2004 year-end "Security Threats and Attack Trends Report" report warns. Then again, the readiness of individuals and companies to confront these challenges has also evolved, the study said.
"It's difficult to say whether we are moving to a steady state," Stuart McIrvine, director of IBM's security strategy, said in an interview. "The threats are increasing, but consumers and businesses are getting a lot smarter."
IBM's report draws on data from 500,000 electronic devices.
It details a range of challenges that computer users faced in 2004 and extrapolates from early warning signs what sort of new threats electronics users are likely to face this year.
Known computer viruses grew by 28,327 in 2004 to bring the number of old and new viruses to 112,438, the report said. In 2002, only 4,551 new viruses were discovered.
Of 147 billion e-mails scanned by IBM for customers in 2004, one in 16, or 6 percent, contained a virus. During 2002, just 0.5 percent of e-mail scanned had viruses.
The average amount of spam circulating on global networks was 75 percent, the survey found. But during peak periods, spam accounted for as much as 95 percent of e-mail traffic.
The fastest-growing threat in 2004 was phishing -- a method of enticing computer users to submit personal information or fall prey to other Internet deceptions. Such e-mails grew 5,000 percent last year, with some 18 million phishing attempts recorded, according to IBM.
THREAT TO CARS
Looking ahead, McIrvine said cars were threatened by computer security threats, some malicious, others unintentional.
As the average new car runs 20 computer processors and about 60 megabytes of software code, the opportunity for malfunctions, wireless attacks and other security threats was multiplying, he said.
Another prediction is that Voice over Internet (VoIP) phone systems will be disrupted. As more companies move to replace traditional phone networks with VoIP systems, eavesdropping on callers and wholesale office network shutdowns carried out by remote attackers are likely to increase, IBM warned.
Kelly Kavanaugh, a computer security analyst with market research company Gartner Inc. of Stamford, Connecticut, said the IBM study highlights some newer threats such as phishing that will only grow more serious during 2005.
However, while computer security viruses and spam are growing, most business customers now understand what is entailed to manage such classic threats.
"These are things that seem to be pretty rapidly heading toward dull roar status," Kavanaugh said of the most well-known computer security threats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.