Linux kernel rewrite claims denied

zdnet ^ | January 18, 2005 | Ingrid Marson

[N3WBI3]

Open Source Development Labs has reportedly rejected reports it is leading a revision of the Linux Kernel to remove code that might infringe software patents

Open Source Development Labs (OSDL), which promotes the adoption of the Linux operating system, has denied that it plans to rewrite the Linux kernel to combat claims that it infringes some software patents.

Linux Business Week reported last week that, according to "informed sources", the OSDL, Intel, IBM, the state of Oregon and the city of Beaverton are part of a consortium that will rewrite the parts of the Linux kernel that allegedly infringe patents. It said that the project, called "Operation Open Gates", aims to stop Microsoft from scaring customers off Linux by claiming that the operating system infringes patents.

In recent months, Microsoft has used the threat of IP infringement as part of its battle against Linux. In October 2004, Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer claimed in an executive email that Windows was a better choice than Linux because it provides protection against legal action over patent violations. A month later, at Microsoft's Asian Government Leaders Forum in Singapore, Ballmer claimed that Linux violates more than 228 patents and that organisations will be at risk of legal action if they use Linux.

But the OSDL has denied that it is planning to rewrite parts of the kernel. According to online news site NewsForge, OSDL officials have said that the report was not accurate, and that while Beaverton is putting $1.2m into economic development around open source software this is not connected to rewriting the Linux kernel.

The OSDL was not available for comment at the time of writing.

[Bush2000]

MS is for guys who dont mind slowing their computer down with virus/spy ware scanning software, and other tools that it needs to be as safe as a *nix.

Don't criticize the OS for poor administration. I don't run in Administrator mode like many users. And, by that same token, I don't suffer from malware, viruses, and other crap. There is nothing about *nix security that Windows doesn't provide. But you have to actually USE the protections, if they're going to be useful.

[Bush2000]

You worry about the national security risks of the Chinese getting hold of software, but it's okay as long as Microsoft made money off of it. Apparently everything has a price.

Straw man -- and you aren't listening. This has nothing to do with Microsoft. We favor trade trade, where it makes sense. But both GE and I are opposed to exporting stuff to China until they improve their human rights record and join the modern world.

[antiRepublicrat]

But both GE and I are opposed to exporting stuff to China until they improve their human rights record and join the modern world.

Then you'd better talk to your namesake, because he's been relaxing all sorts of export controls, and his brother has been helping the Chinese move to a .13 process.