Posted on 01/11/2005 6:18:33 PM PST by malakhi
| Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. |
After a nine month hiatus, The Neverending Story, the granddaddy of daily threads, has returned to Free Republic. Originally begun on March 24, 2001, as a religious discussion thread, the NES evolved over time into a daily thread spanning a wide variety of topics. The new and improved Neverending Story will feature conversation on religion, politics, culture, current events, business, sports, family, hobbies, general fellowship and more. We welcome you to hang your hat in our little corner of FR. We ask you to abide by the FR posting rules and, even in the midst of serious debate, to keep the discussion friendly and respectful. Those who wish to "duke it out" are asked to take it over to the Smoky Backroom. I placed this thread in "General/Chat" for a reason, so play nice and have fun! :o)
Wow. Might be a good chance for him to try out that "sleep" theology that's so near and dear to his heart. :-)
Am I doing something wrong? I've noticed that when I ping more than one person in the ping line lately it only takes one.
Invincibly Ignorant; malakhi
I've been using a comma. Done that for years.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1323573/posts
Hmmm, interesting.
Whatever your image was, it didn't display for me.
where?
Trust me, you didn't miss much. :-)
Here -------> Invincibly Ignorant
BigMack
Invincibly Ignorant; Invincible Dumbass, whats the diff? :-)
The Spanish Roman Catholic Church denied that it had condoned the use of condoms as a legitimate way of fighting HIV/AIDS.
"Contrary to what some have said, it is not true that the Church has changed its position on condoms," the Spanish bishops' conference said in a statement.
The text reasserted that, according to Catholic doctrine, "the use of a condom implies immoral sexual behaviour.
That was quick.
SD
Ya think? I knew there would be a response before there was a story. :-)
So, they were for condoms before they were against them, or something? I'm confused. Was the early story falsely reported, or did someone do a quick back-pedal?
He called II a "Dumbass".
Everything except those ads in the paper offering "Patriots Super Bowl Packages." ;-)
SD
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.