Posted on 01/08/2005 6:30:51 AM PST by pioneerstakethearrows
I heard on an "end of the year summary" that 3/11 Spain 2004, occurred 911 days after 9/11 2001. If true, is anyone concerned that it will soon be 311 days since 3/11. No, I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'd be happy to see it debunked. I'm just curious, and perhaps behind the times.
E.D. Hill said last week, I think, that 3/11 occurred 911 days after 9/11....when she said that, I thought it's not a coinkydink, myself.
Not only is it 911 days apart, it's exactly 6 months for whatever that may be worth
What's a "coinkydink"?
coincidence : )
You may have heard that, but did you actually count the days to see if it was true? March 11, 2004 minus September 11, 2001 = 912 days (not 911 days).
Here, pull my finger!
--Boot Hill
Not that I believe in the conspiracy, but I count 911 days:
19 - remaninder of Sept, 2001
31 - Oct 2001
30 - Nov 2001
31 - Dec 2001
365 - 2002
365 - 2003
31 - Jan 2004
29 - Feb 2004
10 - Mar 2004
____
911
That'd be the days between the two. (3/11 would be "11 - Mar 2004" for a final count of 912 as stated by BootHill) Although it is more convenient for fitting into the coincidence/conspiracy scenario as you (and obviously the "end of the year summary" people)counted it.
The original poster indicated that the show said 3/11 occurred 911 days after 9/11, not that there were 911 days between the two.
19 - remaninder of Sept, 2001
31 - Oct 2001
30 - Nov 2001
31 - Dec 2001
365 - 2002
365 - 2003
31 - Jan 2004
29 - Feb 2004
11 - Mar 2004
____
912
The logic of counting March 11 is the same as asking how many days there are between September 11 and September 21 (10 days).
| September -- 2001 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | ||||||
In a desperate attempt to make the 911 day timeline work, some tin-foilers point to the time difference between Madrid and New York time zones, but there is only 6 hours difference between the two time zones and both attacks occured at approximately the same local time of day (8-9am).
--Boot Hill
Hey! YankeeinOkieville already corrected me. No need to rub it in. :)
 |
+ |  |
--Boot Hill
Has it occured to anyone(besides myself) that we may be doing precisely what Osama wants us to do? Were fighting amongst ourselves over some bogus theory.Divide and conquer?
You're right! It's exactly what the terrorists want! We've already lost...
/sarcasm
Who's fighting?
Fighting may be to strong a term, but we can propose endless theories and extrapolations(until the cows come home) as to whether or not 9/11 and 3/11 were planned and executed according to some "master plan" in which the dates of the attacks are of signifigance re:planning and execution. I think 9/11 took place on 9/11 simply because osama had his people in position,and it was a weekday. In other words, any correlation between 9/11 and 3/11 is simply a coinkydink.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.