Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MissouriConservative

Auburn's strength of schedule rating was #73 in the nation. USC was #13 and Oklahoma was #31.


23 posted on 01/03/2005 8:58:26 PM PST by TheBigB ("Eat my rubber!"--Clark W. Griswold, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: TheBigB

That's the sagrin (sp?) ratings. The NCAA strength of schedule is different as is the Palm strength of schedule...it's all opinion since all three differ so much.

All I know is that Auburn beat (including Virginia Tech tonight) 5 top 15 teams while going undefeated in the SEC.

Auburn should have been playing tomorrow against Oklahoma....I'm not a believer in the "mighty" USC.


34 posted on 01/03/2005 9:04:20 PM PST by MissouriConservative ( Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more; you should never wish to do less. - Robert E. Lee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: TheBigB
Auburn's strength of schedule rating was #73 in the nation. USC was #13 and Oklahoma was #31.

It was explained during the game that Auburn originally had scheduled Bowling Green, but BG pulled out to play Oklahoma leaving Auburn searching for a fill in game. Thats how they got the Citidel. I agree with those who want a playoff, any voting selection has about as much logic as a coin toss. Leave politics out of sports championships. I say this because with the voting, even if USC lost a game and OK lost a game, there are writers and coaches who would not rank AU number one. Voting sucks.

55 posted on 01/03/2005 9:13:22 PM PST by KC_for_Freedom (Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson