To: Drago
I agree. She was not a "troll" as some were stating.
I do not understand how that determination is made. She was quite reasonable.
It would serve all better to talk about these things when kept civil.
To: ScottM1968
Yes, I saw your post #36, and I think it is possible to be very conservative politically and still have an interest in "conservation". Without being an "enviro-wacko"! Things like this from my local newspaper do concern me, and issues like this should concern us all.
http://www.fresnobee.com/special/valley_air/
155 posted on
12/19/2004 11:47:15 PM PST by
Drago
(In one of the worst air pollution areas & hoping I am not Zotted for suggesting we clean it up!)
To: ScottM1968
163 posted on
12/20/2004 5:36:35 AM PST by
concretebob
(but what do I know, I'm just an ignorant peasant)
To: ScottM1968; Drago
She was not a "troll" as some were stating.
Well secluded, Admin Moderators see all.
You may note several posts have been removed. Also, there are some indications - read carefully - that this was a former troll living under another name.
172 posted on
12/20/2004 7:54:36 AM PST by
dr_pat
(Where my vote? Prove my vote count! Me difrenchantized in California!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson