Skip to comments.
Snakes bite back at poison toads [evolution happening now in Australia]
BBC ^
| December 8, 2004
Posted on 12/11/2004 11:50:10 PM PST by snarks_when_bored
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: snarks_when_bored
So, are the dead snakes reproducing?
Or, are other snakes watching and telling their babies not to grow such big mouths?
"evolution" my a$$!
21
posted on
12/12/2004 8:28:48 AM PST
by
G Larry
(Time to update my "Support John Thune!" tagline. Thanks to all who did!)
To: Fatalis
That's a mighty low bar. Dog breeds are examples of evolution by that definition Well it may be low but that is what evolution is, look it up.
To: GreenFreeper
Well it may be low but that is what evolution is, look it up.LOL! Then why not just point to the allele frequencies of dog breeds as examples of evolution and be done with it?
Natural selection is not a synonym for evolution, it is a component of it, just as a tire is not a synonym for a car, but a component of it.
Demonstrating natural selection is an important part of demonstrating evolution, but showing me a tire is not the same as showing me a car.
23
posted on
12/12/2004 9:37:15 AM PST
by
Fatalis
To: freebilly
Not quite evolution. The red-bellied black snake and the green tree snake with larger heads have killed themselves off through eating cane toads; therefore, the snakes with the smaller heads, that can't eat the toads, are going to be the ones left to reproduce. The snakes aren't evolving. The individuals with certain characteristics are just be handed a reproductive advantage.... The distribution of alleles is shifting dramatically in the overall population. Buy a clue, that's evolution is!
24
posted on
12/12/2004 9:38:09 AM PST
by
balrog666
(The invisible and the nonexistent look very much alike.)
To: Blurblogger
Your explanation sounds like 'survival of the fittest'. How is it different?
To: snarks_when_bored
"They seem to be a little bit silly about eating things that taste bad"I won't touch that comment.
To: snarks_when_bored

Worth watching.
27
posted on
12/12/2004 9:54:05 AM PST
by
csvset
To: Byron_the_Aussie
Actually, the cane toads have killed off most of the red-bellies in the north. It's still found in northern Queensland, although its numbers are dwindling.
28
posted on
12/12/2004 11:20:47 AM PST
by
RightWingAtheist
(Marxism-the creationism of the left)
To: merzbow
Exactly. Why is that even when people accept the facts, they can't accept the truth of the larger propositions which naturally derive from them? It's an attitude that reminds of the libs who concede, yeah, the Taliban and the Baathists were awful, and yeah, we have all the evidence that they did awful things, and yeah, they are a threat to world security, BUT THAT DOESN'T JUSTIFY STOPPING THEM!
29
posted on
12/12/2004 11:26:08 AM PST
by
RightWingAtheist
(Marxism-the creationism of the left)
To: G Larry
So, are the dead snakes reproducing? Evolution has as much to do with the least fit organisms not reproducing as it does with the fittest surviving. The snakes which are dying before they can reproduce, or at least bear a large enough number of offspring to pass their genes on to, are those which are least fit to adapt to this intruder-species in their mist. Those which are surviving and are able to reproduce quickly enough are those who have features-be they smaller heads, greater resistance to poison, or whatnot-which allows them to better cope with the invaders.
30
posted on
12/12/2004 11:32:45 AM PST
by
RightWingAtheist
(Marxism-the creationism of the left)
To: csvset
31
posted on
12/12/2004 11:33:49 AM PST
by
RightWingAtheist
(Marxism-the creationism of the left)
To: balrog666
Must have been asleep during that class.... ;^)
To: TheTwelvePack
No, because the snakes aren't giving birth to frogs, as per creationist evolution.
33
posted on
12/12/2004 11:54:47 AM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Blurblogger
No one said that they weren't becoming anything but snakes. Evolution is more than just speciation.
Odd how many creationists claim to accept what they call "micro-evolution", and his would fit that description, and yet now creationists are still jumping on this and shouting "this isn't evolution!"
34
posted on
12/12/2004 11:57:28 AM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
I don't care what changes have happened to those snakes, they are STILL SNAKES.
35
posted on
12/12/2004 12:27:53 PM PST
by
JudyB1938
("A paranoid schizophrenic is somebody who just found out what's going on." - Wm S. Burroughs, Jr.)
To: RightWingAtheist
Ah, new discovery.
"Extinction proof of evolution!"
Glad to hear we can quit wasting time and money protecting "endangered species".
36
posted on
12/12/2004 12:48:51 PM PST
by
G Larry
(Time to update my "Support John Thune!" tagline. Thanks to all who did!)
To: G Larry
"Extinction proof of evolution!" It would be more accurate to say that extinction is explained by evolution.
Glad to hear we can quit wasting time and money protecting "endangered species".
On the contrary, understanding how species evolve and adapt has allowed for improved wildlife conservation, and a better understanding of which species are truly at risk. If more people on both side of the aisle actually took the time to understand evolution (and basic economics), the "land rights vs. the environment" debate would be considerably less acrimonious.
37
posted on
12/12/2004 1:04:27 PM PST
by
RightWingAtheist
(Marxism-the creationism of the left)
To: RightWingAtheist
The red-bellied black snake is under no threat from the cane toad. Their ranges barely intermingle:

Cheers, Byron
38
posted on
12/12/2004 1:21:58 PM PST
by
Byron_the_Aussie
(http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
To: Senator Goldwater
"They seem to be a little bit silly about eating things that taste bad"I won't touch that comment.
Especially coming from 'Down Under' what is that #@$&%!! stuff called, marmite or vegemite or whatever? ;-)
39
posted on
12/12/2004 1:39:09 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: PatrickHenry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson