Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: snarks_when_bored
"The cosmological constant is back...it seems to account for the accelerating cosmic expansion..."

No, it doesn't account for the expansion of the universe. Not at all. Not even close. Add the cosmological constant back in to GR and you get a *static* universe, per Einstein's 1919 paper...something that Edwin Hubble conclusively disproved in the 1960's with his direct observations of our expanding universe.

All of this back and forth nonsense with GR and String Theories just goes to show that our current crop of scientists will try *anything*, no matter how absurd, in order to avoid saying that either GR or QM is bunk. Putting the CC back into GR, 4 decades after Hubble, now *that* is funny!

Yet one of those two theories *is* bunk. They are mutually exclusive, after all.

59 posted on 12/07/2004 12:30:13 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Southack
Your# 59......Amen!

They are mutually exclusive, after all!

:-)

60 posted on 12/07/2004 12:33:55 PM PST by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: Southack
Sorry, you're mis-informed. Read the September, 2004, issue of Scientific American.

Also read Susskind's comments from the second of the Edge links I posted here.

62 posted on 12/07/2004 12:41:37 PM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson