Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ammonite fossils in Mount Everest and crocodiles NOW in the Sahara - evolution censors fooled
http://www.daserste.de/programm/tvtipp.asp?datum=06.12.2004 ^ | Dec. 6 | self

Posted on 12/06/2004 3:59:43 PM PST by Truth666

December 6, 2004, 9:45 P.M : the first channel of German television shows the premiere for the film "Time journeys", by Adam White and Sara Ford, supposed to be one more in the series of latest documentaries using the latest computer technology to cover-up the evolution hoax.
But this time something unprecedented happened : an audience of more than 3 million gets the chance to be informed about some of the latest facts exposing evolution, that the censors managed to hide so far.
The film starts by asking two of those facts. How comes you finf
- ammonite fossils near the top of Mount Everest, and
- crocodiles (a new species discovered in 2002, much smaller than the Nile crocodiles) living in the middle of the Sahara.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: evolution; fauxiantroll; fauxiantrolls; youngearthdelusion; youngearthdelusions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: NeuronExMachina

Not to take your post too seriously (recognizing the winkie), One really must wonder how long it would take the slow moving sea creatures to climb from the Bay of Bengal to the heights of Everest.


41 posted on 12/07/2004 8:47:28 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Not to take your post too seriously (recognizing the winkie), One really must wonder how long it would take the slow moving sea creatures to climb from the Bay of Bengal to the heights of Everest.

I think the current rate measured is about a quarter inch per year (or four years per inch). Making the probably unsafe assumption that the rate has been constant for the past N years:

4 (year/inch) * (12 inches/foot) * 29,035 (feet) = 1,393,680 years

Of course, that's an absurdly rough calculation, but I think it's around the right order of magnitude.

42 posted on 12/08/2004 1:06:15 AM PST by NeuronExMachina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Truth666
to people who write : sea-fossils found where they oughtn't be can easily be explained by plate tectonics. Mountains are the results of two plates pushing up against each other, so the ground is going to raise up.
Since the formation of mountains takes an exceedingly long time ... I win. Do I get a cookie?

No you don't. Of course the film had to keep repeating the "plate tectonics" explanation - that's what the film makers were paid for, and that's why (as I explained before) the key points of the film were not censored. But ...
43 posted on 12/08/2004 10:39:50 AM PST by Truth666 (http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Proof+that+at+least+one+of+two%22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth666

... but to help the brain washed public (any child is able to understand that only zombies can swallow a story of an ammonite being raised from sea level to 7000 meters altitude, proudly keeping its form and balance on top of the world ...) on this subject, the film makers found also a good example. It was presented also right at the beginning of the film. A plane crashing in a New Zealand glacier, does that ring a bell ?


44 posted on 12/08/2004 10:44:36 AM PST by Truth666 (http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Proof+that+at+least+one+of+two%22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
It's not really breaking news that we find giant seashell fossils in the middle of west Texas, for example.

I found a "New Coke" can along the highway the other day.

45 posted on 12/08/2004 10:56:15 AM PST by dirtboy (Tagline temporarily out of commission due to excessive intake of gin-soaked raisins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Truth666
... but to help the brain washed public (any child is able to understand that only zombies can swallow a story of an ammonite being raised from sea level to 7000 meters altitude, proudly keeping its form and balance on top of the world ...) on

Rather straightforward explanation for that.

I don't agree with all premises of evolutionary theory. But you are confusing plate tectonics with evolution - two very different subjects.

But, then again, you confuse a lot of things.

46 posted on 12/08/2004 10:57:31 AM PST by dirtboy (Tagline temporarily out of commission due to excessive intake of gin-soaked raisins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Truth666

I'm a little confused here... do you think the measurements showing the height of Mt Everest constantly increasing have been falsified?


47 posted on 12/08/2004 1:38:03 PM PST by NeuronExMachina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: NeuronExMachina

That's irrelevant for this issue


48 posted on 12/09/2004 10:50:36 AM PST by Truth666 (http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Proof+that+at+least+one+of+two%22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Truth666

Forgive me, for I haven't seen the documentary myself. Could you elaborate on what your objection is?


49 posted on 12/09/2004 11:05:45 AM PST by NeuronExMachina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: NeuronExMachina

It's all clearly stated in the sequence I wrote above in this thread. If you don't understand a particular step in that sequence, please state it


50 posted on 12/09/2004 11:12:38 AM PST by Truth666 (http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Proof+that+at+least+one+of+two%22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: don'tbedenied
I say we take the flat earthers from here and the DUmmies and give 'em their own site. We can call it Tin Foil Underground Republic.

The bunny with a pancake on its head can be the mascot.

51 posted on 12/10/2004 7:00:52 PM PST by rdl6989 (4 More Years! 4 More Years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

placemarker


52 posted on 05/24/2005 3:22:27 AM PDT by bobdsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: bobdsmith

oops sorry i didnt realise the thread was so old :O


53 posted on 05/24/2005 3:23:13 AM PDT by bobdsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson