Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RetiredArmy
Well, they smacked Texas A&M silly this year, so your "(maybe)" is appropriate. They also embarrassed North Carolina, which turned around and whooped Miami.

They spanked the PAC-10's Arizona, too.

The Utes fielded a very fine and well-coached team this year. I'm sure it wouldn't injure your dignity too much to graciously admit it. ;-)

71 posted on 11/30/2004 2:02:24 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: JCEccles
The records of the mighty schedule that Utah played were: 7-4; 2-9; 3-8; 5-6; 7-4; 6-5; 2-9; 4-7; 4-7; 6-5; and 5-6. A&M was the first 7-4 and they played the first game of the year. A&M was much improved after that. The other 7-4 was also one of their conference opponents, which by the way beat up on the same bunch of 2-9 and 3-8 teams that Utah beat. So, that is not a very impressive schedule, when the total record was 51 wins and 70 losses!!! No sir, not a very impressive schedule at all. I stand by what I have said in earlier posts. Utah would be 6-5 or 5-6 in the SEC or Big 10. Maybe 7-4 in the ACC. With the PAC 10 being down this year, they might be 7-4 there, but again that depends on their non-conf schdule.
73 posted on 11/30/2004 2:08:12 PM PST by RetiredArmy (The government is taking your Freedoms away. What R U going to do to stop it???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson