Just as FLAME BAIT since I haven't read the article...
Could it be possible that the studies looked at HEART PATIENTS (already at increased risk of death) and found higher incidence of mortality due to the population studied?
By analogy if one studied runners (Jim Fixx...) who had a family history of heart disease, would the study conclude that running was not ameliorative?
Oh, did Pfizer or Merck help fund this work?
[Asbestos suit DONNED while running away, popping Vitamin E capsules...]
Could it be possible that the studies looked at HEART PATIENTS (already at increased risk of death) and found higher incidence of mortality due to the population studied?>>>
Yes, they looked at sick people. How about all people who DON'T get heart disease because they take vitamin e