Posted on 11/09/2004 5:17:51 PM PST by oldtimer
We have been hearing that the libs want to secede from the redneck, Bible thumping, knuckle dragging and so forth, spewing hatred from so called Red States that should be blue States.
#1 There will be no healing. That is a crock of clinton
#2The libs want to kind of merge with Canada, and that is a wonderful thing.
#3 The libs love Government, and want socialism, and Canada (especially the frogs in Quebec) would love them.
#4 Libs, so don't let the doorknob hit you in the arse, when you exit the US.
We will drill and process the oil...
we will grow, harvest, and process the food supply...
we will demand our public school teachers actually teach our children...
we will have the will and the ability to protect our way of life....
we will make the suckers pay through the nose when their resources run out and their bankrupt socialist experiment fails...
I propose a trade. They can have the blue counties, and we get Alberta and Manitoba.
I got a good idea. Let's create a new state, name, Jefferson, capital Yakima. It'll be Washington and Oregon east of the Cascades. And another state, Appalachia, all the red counties in mountainous Maryland, Pennsylvania, and New York. Then we might have a state called "Eerie," including Pittsburgh, Erie, Youngstown, and Cleveland, the eerie rust belt. (Pennsylvania would be split by Appalachia.) Then split up California, Illinois, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota...so that the "red" counties stay ours.
They aren't so much "blue states" as "blue spots"; blemishes on the body politic.
Their other problem is that we're the one's with all the guns.
BTTT!
I say we start a fund to ship them all over to Cuba...after all, they think socialism is so great, let them wallow in it.
I give them one week before they're crying "Let us come back!"
President Lincoln gave his life to preserve the Union. I live in a blue state and I don't want to go anywhere. These "secessionists" are being ridiculous.
Why Canada. Why not Cuba or North Korea. They will love it there because it is a socialist paradise to them.
Sweet Mercy, I wish they would! Then we could restrict our airspace. We'd be the "fly-around" instead of the "Fly-over", and except for exporting everything made under the sun to them, we would be rid of them for good.
Why not just let them go? Seriously, is it really worth a war to retain the left wing cultural dumpster of Massachusetts - where every single county voted for Kerry and every single congressman and senator is a liberal democrat - when the only gain from doing so is to keep their left wing delegations to vote and filibuster us in Congress? If they want to go let em go and let em take Vermont, Rhode Island, and Connecticut with them. It'd be no loss to us.
1. 26 fewer Democrat electoral votes.
2. 8 fewer far left Democrat Senators.
3. 2 fewer RINO Senators
4. Several fewer Democrat representatives
5. The only two states in the union that recognize gay marriages or unions.
6. The state that has produced Michael Dukakis, John Kerry, and all of the Kennedys.
Take out New England and Bush's victory was a landslide. Take out New England and we've got a filibuster-proof and veto proof senate. Take out New England and the Democrats can never dream of retaking Congress anytime soon. Take out New England and the single most concentrated source of leftist Democrat socialism in the country is no longer around to infect the rest of us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.