1 posted on
11/07/2004 4:51:32 PM PST by
Jo Nuvark
To: Jo Nuvark
2 posted on
11/07/2004 4:52:28 PM PST by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Sun goes up, pants go up. Sun goes down, pants go down.)
To: Jo Nuvark
Your caps-lock key got stuck. I thought you might want to know that.
3 posted on
11/07/2004 4:52:49 PM PST by
Asclepius
(protectionists would outsource our dignity and prosperity in return for illusory job security)
To: Jo Nuvark
If you had already voted in that poll on the same computer, your husband's vote would not be counted because it came from the same IP address. I highly doubt it's a conspiracy on the part of CNN.
4 posted on
11/07/2004 4:53:48 PM PST by
AQGeiger
(Have you hugged your soldier today?)
To: Jo Nuvark
Who cares what a poll says on CNN's website?
6 posted on
11/07/2004 4:55:02 PM PST by
RWR8189
(Its Morning in America Again!)
To: Jo Nuvark
This is the Communist New Network we are talking about here...
Praise the Lord!
7 posted on
11/07/2004 4:55:15 PM PST by
presidentbowen
(God Bless Ronald Reagan!)
To: Jo Nuvark
I vote for evolution. It's something the Democratic Party might want to consider doing soon, too.
8 posted on
11/07/2004 4:55:23 PM PST by
spinestein
("We have to go by our own rules, we'd rather be last than be wrong" by Dan Rather)
To: Jo Nuvark
10 posted on
11/07/2004 4:55:48 PM PST by
Sloth
("Rather is TV's real-life Ted Baxter, without Baxter's quiet dignity." -- Ann Coulter)
To: Jo Nuvark
That's disappointing. A full 1/3 of responders think creationism should be taught in school? Maybe we should add alchemy, astrology, augury to the curriculum as well. Supplement the 3 R's with the 3 A's.
13 posted on
11/07/2004 4:56:56 PM PST by
beavus
To: Jo Nuvark
When I find the poll, I will vote NO to Creationism. What a crock of you know what it is.
Old fart in pajamas who majored in Geology.........
15 posted on
11/07/2004 4:59:05 PM PST by
LaMudBug
To: Jo Nuvark
Creationism should not be taught in a science class period. Scientific theories must enable one to make predictions which can later be tested, they must possess the property of POTENTIAL FALSIFIABILITY. Creationism does not possess the property of potential falsifiability since no matter what the outcome of an experiment one could argue that Satan is manipulating measurements to mislead mankind. This doesn't mean that creationism is false or doesn't contain some truth, it just means that it is not a subject that falls under the scope of science and as such should not be part of science curriculum.
18 posted on
11/07/2004 5:01:08 PM PST by
Avenger
To: Jo Nuvark
It should be taught in a class on religion/philisophy. It should not be taught as science.
We need to get to a point where science and religion do not clash. They are for the most part working in different domains: religion cannot put a man on the moon and science cannot explain the meaning of life or even human consciousness.
20 posted on
11/07/2004 5:09:12 PM PST by
Avenger
To: Jo Nuvark
I can't find the poll. However, if I could, I'd vote that it should not be taught.
26 posted on
11/07/2004 5:36:27 PM PST by
DoctorMichael
(The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson