Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/28/2004 9:25:52 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Blurblogger

Let me adjust my tinfoil and I'll get back to you an a few


2 posted on 10/28/2004 9:28:29 PM PDT by MJY1288 (A MONDAY MORNING QUARTERBACK HAS NEVER LED ANY TEAM TO VICTORY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blurblogger

Do you have anything constructive to add here?


3 posted on 10/28/2004 9:28:49 PM PDT by endthematrix (10 out of 10 terrorists agree-Anybody but Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blurblogger
My question is why didn't the UN destroy the weapons instead of sealing them? Negligence and incompetence on their part, if you ask me. Saddam wasn't supposed to have any of these weapons so they should've been destroyed immediately.
5 posted on 10/28/2004 9:29:51 PM PDT by Azzurri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blurblogger

One problem with that idea...

Dana Lewis(Embedded reported-who worked for NBC at the time)....and many many soldiers have stated that there were no IAEA Seals when they got there.

So if that was there plan......then they blew it when they forgot to put the seals on the bunkers.


6 posted on 10/28/2004 9:29:55 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud (Kerry wants to steal documents, taxes, my gun, etc. And now the commie punk wants to steal my vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blurblogger

You joined to post this crap?


7 posted on 10/28/2004 9:30:08 PM PDT by Howlin (Bush has claimed two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blurblogger

Blurblogger
Since Oct 29, 2004


troll


8 posted on 10/28/2004 9:30:17 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blurblogger

Not necessarily to frame Bush. I suspect El Baradei and his goons knew the Oil for Food thugs were getting big bucks from Saddam and they wanted some money to look the other way while he did whatever it was he wanted with the explosives. That would explain why they found so little while they were in Iraq for several years. My guess is that the weapons inspectors probably have some extra cash stashed away. This may have been a preemptive strike to preclude any disclosures of the Oil for Food type. If Kerry is elected, the problem goes away. If Bush is elected, look for weapons inspectors and Oil for Food people to fall from the Eiffel Tower.


9 posted on 10/28/2004 9:31:00 PM PDT by Lunkhead_01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blurblogger

Hardly likely that they could keep quiet about it for 18 months...


11 posted on 10/28/2004 9:31:33 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blurblogger

Right...wing nut...

The UN conspired to seal bunker, arrange for a film crew, and then sit on it for 2 years...

Its dirty politics...nothing more...


12 posted on 10/28/2004 9:32:34 PM PDT by antaresequity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blurblogger

Welcome to FR!


13 posted on 10/28/2004 9:32:59 PM PDT by landerwy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Blurblogger

I just spent 20 minutes trying to write a response that articulated how ridiculous this is and was unsuccessful. And then I realized how ridiculous the whole idea was. These are explosives that are only fractionally more powerful than basic TNT. RDX was invented in 1890. Get it?


25 posted on 10/28/2004 9:49:48 PM PDT by ml1954
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson