To: GeronL
What they did was to interrogate a child not even suspected of wrongdoing.The police "interrogate" witnesses all the time who are not suspected of wrong doing.
As I said, if they had suspended the boy or charged him criminally with something I could see a reason to be upset. But that didn't happen.
When it's all said and done, he had to take home a note. That's it.
Are you telling me when you were a kid that no one was ever sent to the principal's office without a parent present?
To: Behind Liberal Lines
"The police "interrogate" witnesses all the time who are not suspected of wrong doing."
I see that you don't know the legal difference between an interrogation and an interview.
122 posted on
10/28/2004 7:30:26 PM PDT by
familyop
(Receive, adhere, listen, dissolve, entice and launch.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Are you telling me when you were a kid that no one was ever sent to the principal's office without a parent present? I think that happened to me once in Elementary School (I am concerned about the younger kids mostly), I left the school and went home and got a parent!
124 posted on
10/28/2004 7:32:03 PM PDT by
GeronL
(FREE KERRY'S SCARY bumper sticker .......... http://www.kerrysscary.com/bumper_sticker.php)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
<<
The police "interrogate" witnesses all the time who are not suspected of wrong doing.
>>
The assistant principal is not the police. The police do not, or should not, interview or interrogate minors unwitnessed.
126 posted on
10/28/2004 7:33:12 PM PDT by
MagnumRancid
(I cut it three times......It's still too short!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson