Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush couldn't remember he was Governor of Texas during an O'Reilly interview.
Ebay Discussion Group ^ | 9/29/2004 | john_wade

Posted on 09/29/2004 5:59:10 PM PDT by grassboots.org

I saw this on the "Jimmy Kimmel" late night TV show last night. They played a clip of Bush in a TV interview with O'Reilly.

He asked Bush about the flood of illegal Mexicans and Bush said "When I was Governor of....uh." "When I was Governor of uhhhh...ummmm..uh" "When I was Governor of ummmmm....uhhhh....uhhhh."

O'Reilly said; "Mr. Bush, they're not going to like that answer." He had the most disgusted look I've ever seen on a TV interviewer.

(Excerpt) Read more at forums.ebay.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: billoreilly; presidentbush
This is the Michael Moore Crowd at Its Finest.
1 posted on 09/29/2004 5:59:11 PM PDT by grassboots.org
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grassboots.org

Please tell me that someone corrected that boob.


2 posted on 09/29/2004 6:00:47 PM PDT by alnick (US forces armed with what? Spitballs??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grassboots.org

Brit Hume played this Kimmel thing at the end of his show today. It was obvious it was doctored. There was no effort to hide this. Are these people really that dumb?


3 posted on 09/29/2004 6:00:59 PM PDT by Bahbah (Proud member of the pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grassboots.org

Yes, the place is infested with liberals.


4 posted on 09/29/2004 6:01:03 PM PDT by KEVLAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grassboots.org

It was a joke...., they spliced the interview to make it look like he didn't answer.


5 posted on 09/29/2004 6:01:14 PM PDT by SolitaryMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grassboots.org

Of course that's not how it went. There is a transcript to prove it.


6 posted on 09/29/2004 6:01:36 PM PDT by Trust but Verify (Charter member Broken Glass Republicans (2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Since the President hit a homerun in this interview, all they were left with was the ability to manipulate footage for a few cheap laughs.

It's a compliment to the president this is the best they could do.


7 posted on 09/29/2004 6:03:58 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grassboots.org

This type of attack should be encouraged. The left helps Bush every time they call him an idiot.


8 posted on 09/29/2004 6:05:07 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: alnick

Northcarolinianforbush set him straight (it was a threadstoper)


10 posted on 09/29/2004 7:02:07 PM PDT by grassboots.org (US Forces Armed With What? Spitballs?!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Yes, they are that dumb


11 posted on 09/29/2004 7:02:32 PM PDT by grassboots.org (US Forces Armed With What? Spitballs?!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grassboots.org

what about the flood of illegal Mexicans ?


12 posted on 09/29/2004 7:15:05 PM PDT by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grassboots.org

I am deeply saddened by this. </Daschle> ;-)


13 posted on 09/29/2004 8:04:45 PM PDT by Hawkeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay
what about the flood of illegal Mexicans ? What do you suggest?
14 posted on 09/29/2004 9:13:52 PM PDT by grassboots.org (US Forces Armed With What? Spitballs?!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: grassboots.org

"What do you suggest?"

A strong president should take a stand against business operations who use an illegal immigrant work force. If these businesses cannot make a profit without being subsidized by tax payers social programs, such as energy health education roads and water projects needed to support the massive population growth, then they should cease to exist. This is a capitalist country that is the way it works, if businesses cannot pay their own bills they need to close, we are not supposed to be funding socialist work projects with tax payer funds to make up the difference.

The modern the day plantation owners do not have the moral clarity to understand, nor will they change their ways unless threatened by the government in the same manner as was done before the civil war to the slave owners. Yet today we wont see this from this republican party whose only goal is to report financial growth so they look better on paper than the other party.

The republican party of today should start acting like the republican party of old formed during the conflict of slavery.

As a reminder; before the civil war wealthy business owners tried to push slavery on the country which promted Radical republicans to favor immediate eradication of an institution they viewed as iniquitous. President Bushe's plan for amnesty and continuation of the present situation of a low paid slave workforce is in complete opposition to those Radical members of the first republican party, whom in the end were proven right.






http://www.civilwarhome.com/republicans.htm

The Republican party in 1861 was a coalition of disparate elements. Formed only 7 years earlier, it contained men who had been Whigs, Anti-Slavery Democrats, Free-Soilers, Know-Nothings, and Abolitionists. By the outbreak of the war, these fragments had coalesced into 3 basic factions: conservatives, moderates, and radicals. President Abraham Lincoln's task was to mold these factions into a government that could win the war without destroying the South politically and economically.

The most aggressive and, eventually, most influential of the three was the Radical Republican faction. All Republicans were against slavery, but this group was the most "radical", in its opposition to the "peculiar institution." While conservatives favored gradual emancipation combined with colonization of Freedmen, and while moderates favored emancipation but with reservations, Radicals favored immediate eradication of an institution they viewed as iniquitous, and saw the war as a crusade for "Abolition."


15 posted on 09/29/2004 11:18:14 PM PDT by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: seastay

No Disagreements.


16 posted on 09/30/2004 12:14:32 PM PDT by grassboots.org (US Forces Armed With What? Spitballs?!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson