1 posted on
09/24/2004 7:04:33 PM PDT by
ducman
To: ducman
Yes, he did use the word pretend but more as to pretending that we know exactly what's going to happen in January. He was setting up a hypothetical situation. If elections couldn't be held in all of Iraq but only in 75% or 80% of it, that would still be a good outcome.
2 posted on
09/24/2004 7:09:18 PM PDT by
Bob
To: ducman
3 posted on
09/24/2004 7:17:22 PM PDT by
MEG33
(John Kerry has been AWOL on issues of national security for two decades)
To: ducman
Don't you understand what Rumsfeld is saying? He is trying to explain to obstinate and hostile reporters what the facts are and one tactic is offering hypotheticals and/or future anticipated plans like the elections.
What's the prob?
Of course one must be semi-smart and maybe a smidge sophisticated to get it....then again, I think the average American of goodwill understands.
6 posted on
09/24/2004 7:39:49 PM PDT by
cyncooper
(Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson