Posted on 09/23/2004 10:05:25 AM PDT by GIJoel
Yeah, a LOT of people dislike having others see their replies, because I make them look bad.
You want privacy, use FReepmail.
Perhaps you should modify the way you interact with people who believe honor actually means something.
Joel, me lad, I would suggest that you retract that remark. Generally, it is the thoroughly despicable and dishonorable
And as usual, you twisted what I said.
No, I didn't. People who whine about others seeing their replies Fisked always trot out that tired cliche about standing alone. It's an attempt to compare their sounding like a damn fool to some sort of physical act of courage.
No one challenged you to a fistfight (although, I bet that happens to you alot).
Actually, it doesn't.
I was challenging you to a debate on the merits of our mutually exclusive positions re: collapse of the Soviet Union.
And then you whined about others seeing my comments.
You declined. And then you resumed spewing innuendo and outright falsehoods.
You also failed to address the 145 footnotes I posted above from "We Are the Next Target." And then you had the unmitigated gall to repeat your spurious claim that "Soviet Moles" is mostly a self-referential document.
It's self-referential in that its central thesis all about Golitsyn, all the time. The non-Golitsyn elements could have been deleted without affecting the content of the report; the newspaper articles referenced were not relevant to the central thesis.
When you have one source, and no independent evidence to back it up (except other people quoting that one source), you have a credibility problem.
And BTW, Inside Story: World Report never ever published a single article on AIDS.
Are you maintaining that ISWR and Inside Story Communications are two separate entities with no contact whatsoever?
Same organization, but they never published a single article on AIDS. So how on earth could you claim that their "AIDS" sources are "self-referential." If you can't produce the article(s) in question, then you have just been exposed AGAIN as a dispensor of fabricated "facts."
Because they're the same organization. You're engaged in hair-splitting to the point of insanity. ISC = ISWR = ISC. Deal with it.
Why you are the very traitorous scum that makes me have to watch my words. You are the enemy within, the one who would run to your Imam if you could find the least tidbit to poison your neighbor with. A knife in your neighbors back for a pat on the head. Good little doggie...
Want to know how many nukes America has? Keep playing Jihad and we will be glad to help you all count.
What are you babbling about?
Reminds me of a bunch of cowards in backlavas holding ak47's over their head cheering their great victory in a kindergarten.
You mind explaining that insult, sonny boy? Or do I have to call your mother and tell her you're using her AOL account again?
Somehow in Jihad land, when it is pointed out that their logic is flawed, it is their victory.
You have yet to demonstrate any validity to your claims. You claim that you have detailed, inside knowledge, after claiming that nobody has that knowledge. Now, like I said, that could just be a matter of nuance.
If you have facts, roll them out. If you don't have facts, quit whining about it.
Sinkspur and Poohbah are the enemy to you? Boy are you in the wrong place.
DEE-lusional.
[and that there never were WMD's in Iraq.. ]
"Agent Behind Fake Uranium Documents Worked for France"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1225538/posts
What people forget, willingly, is the binary chemical artillery shell rigged as an IED.
bttt
bttt
FYI.......ping
FYI.......ping
FYI.......ping
bump for later
Is the IWSR the Jewish publication that was recently accused (in the months just before the Election) of leaking confidential material by the Agency or the FBI? Or was that another publication?
Thanks in advance.
The insidious, anti-American Russia advocacy crowd is particularly nasty, and eventually, we each see the agenda behind their ostensible agenda. They don't deserve more than a copy&paste.
Russian FM To Israel: Chechnya No, Palestine and Iranian Nukes Yes
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1210302/posts
Putin uses war on terrorism to tighten grip on democracy [No more elections for governors.]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1215159/posts
Russia confirms further delays to Iran`s nuke plant
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1210369/posts
Russia defends arms sales to Iran
http://www.freedomdomain.com/Templemount/5_30a.html
Russia denies Iran's nuclear plant facing delays
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1201134/posts
Russia, N.Korea, China give Iran missile aid -CIA
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/519198/posts
Russian threats alarm Georgia
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1216005/posts
Syria brokers secret deal to send atomic weapons scientists to Iran
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1227104/posts?page=24
Iran recruits 'human shield' for nuclear reactor
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1210366/posts
Iraq's arms ["The big three arms suppliers were Russia (and the Soviet Union), China and France"]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1219679/posts
Moscow 'vehemently' opposes attacks on Iraq
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25619
Orion78's page of links on deals between Iran, Syria, Caucasus, Balkans, Europe,...
http://www.freerepublic.com/~orion78/
Poisoned by Putin
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1215034/posts
Powell Concerned by Putin Political Changes
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1215871/posts
Kissinger info post
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.