Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LINDA VESTER OF FNC, NEW RATHERGATE REVELATIONS ON AT 1:00PM EASTERN TIME
CRUSHELITS ^ | September 17, 2003 | CRUSHELITS

Posted on 09/17/2004 9:45:58 AM PDT by crushelits

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Damn...well forget Home Depot. I'm hanging around.


Ahhhhh,Home Depot is a 60 minutes sponsor. It's hard to stay away, but do your local independent hardware store a favor and go pay a little more with them
21 posted on 09/17/2004 9:52:57 AM PDT by DAC22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: itzmygun
don't think it's the NG letters. She said something about an author who had proof of another story they had faked.

If true, this is a double-edged sword. While it would be entertaining to watch the MSM rip apart CBS's reporting for the last 20 years or so, I would rather they keep the focus on Rathergate.

22 posted on 09/17/2004 9:53:07 AM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

CBS NOW CLAIMING MEMOS AND DAN RATHER ARE REAL BUT REST OF WORLD IS FAKE
DEVELOPING..... ...

23 posted on 09/17/2004 9:53:28 AM PDT by hispanarepublicana (Miss Free Republic High School-1986)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana

Dan is resigning :)


24 posted on 09/17/2004 9:54:19 AM PDT by USA_Soccer (Try a better (free + open source) browser -> Mozilla Firefox @ mozilla.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2

thanks!


25 posted on 09/17/2004 9:54:57 AM PDT by Future Useless Eater (FreedomLoving_Engineer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana

ROTFLMAO! you have my vote for post of the day


26 posted on 09/17/2004 9:55:32 AM PDT by Cosmo (Dan Rather is F@$#$ed : F@#$@ed like a horned toad under a moonlit Texas sky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

27 posted on 09/17/2004 9:56:07 AM PDT by Constitution Day (...I've kissed mermaids, rode the El Niño, walked the sand with the crustaceans....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All

NO HINTS, THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID, SHE IS ON NOW.


28 posted on 09/17/2004 9:56:10 AM PDT by crushelits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

More teasers . . . stay tuned . . . why do they do this to us?


29 posted on 09/17/2004 9:56:50 AM PDT by WashingtonSource (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

Bump


30 posted on 09/17/2004 9:57:15 AM PDT by Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DAC22
Home Depot is a 60 minutes sponsor. It's hard to stay away, but do your local independent hardware store a favor and go pay a little more with them

Thanks, I own an independent hardware store, but I am 20 miles from the nearest large home center, so I still have a few more years left in the business.

31 posted on 09/17/2004 9:57:53 AM PDT by NeonKnight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource
A grainy Dan Rather on a Kinko's surveillance video?

I can dream, can't I?

32 posted on 09/17/2004 9:58:08 AM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

1 eastern is in five minutes or so.
will you post the essence of what she is saying as she says it?

thanks.
don't have access to fox.


33 posted on 09/17/2004 9:58:08 AM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (Robert the "RINO")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource

Like I've been telling you, there are more documents, lots more. Jim Gehrety from the Kerry Spot verified this, this morning.


34 posted on 09/17/2004 9:58:17 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day; Tijeras_Slim
Now how did I know you were gonna post that.

(I'm clairvoyant, that's how!)

35 posted on 09/17/2004 9:58:17 AM PDT by martin_fierro (_____oooo_( ° ¿ ° )_oooo_____)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: crushelits
The Dano-saur at DNCBS is calling for The President “answer the charges”, and prove that he wasn’t AWOL or defy a direct order to take a physical 35 years ago. Now it is time for Dan Rather-criminal to answer his questions. Why did you knowingly use obviously forged documents to bring charges against President Bush? Why did you try to defraud the American People with your false charges? Who was the source of your forged documents. Until he answers these questions he is guilty of forgery and defrauding the American Public.

In a day when docu-fiction is the rule and the Dirty Rat Michael Mooron is the standard bearer for the Stone-age press then we will play by their rules. Dan Rather is guilty until he can prove himself innocent and in this case it is very likely true. If Kitty Kelly can drudge up sludge with no proof from 30 years ago then we have more than enough proof to consider Dan Rather-guilty. This was the co-ordinated attack from the DNC to damage our President for the Yaaaawn Kerry campaign.

Forging military documents is a criminal offense although someone as powerful as Rather won’t be convicted like one of us would. This was a powerful man using the power of the Mainstream media and the clout of 60 Minutes to topple a government. 60 Minutes was the foundation of investigative TV and has 30 years of distinguished journalism behind it. Unfortunately we got a glimpse into how honest that journalism is. This was the rule rather than the exception as we got a glimpse of their sources, especially the anonymous variety. This time his hatred and desparation made him go off the abyss and into the complete fabrication of evidence. How could he not notice the Kinko’s Fax return line??? Nice that they whited that out before they put it on their Webpage which added 15 mins to Howlin & Cos exposure!

If Dino-Dan thinks that W should answer questions from false evidence then Dan needs to answer questions about why he used forged evidence. His charges have absolutely no substance but these charges are valid. So Dan, why did you put these forged documents and signatures of a dead Military Officer on your news program??

This is what happens when 95% of the Stone-age press worships at the feet of moral relitivists like bull clinton. The art of “spin”, or lies as it was called pre-clinton becomes varying degrees of lying. GW has the truth on his side just as the Swifties do. Yaaaawn Tax & Kerry and DNCBS only have lies on their side and must hide from the issues. In comes this mudslinging story and the high risk phony documents that are scrutinized by the Inter-news. The evidence gets blown away in a matter of minutes and the fraud is exposed to the entire world. It’s a new day and the Fathers of Freedom would be proud.

Dano-saur Rather-guilty can resign and DNCBS can apologize to the country for their criminal activity but it won’t matter. The Stone-age press has exposed itself for the Rat spokesman that it is and will never be believed again. They can pretend to be more balanced but whenever they use their well worn phrases, “sources inside the .....” ears will hear “false documents” and a huge mountain of salt will be added. For Dan, he needs to take his own advice and, “answer the charges!” In the Michael Mooron, Kitty Katty world, your found guilty unless you can prove yourself innocent!

Pray for W and The Truth

36 posted on 09/17/2004 10:00:20 AM PDT by bray (Nam Vets Rock!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

The screen says that it is the 1988 Rather expose on Vietnam soldiers who committed atrocities, since proved false - which Rush discussed yesterday.


37 posted on 09/17/2004 10:01:14 AM PDT by baseballmom (You Know Where I Stand - GW Bush - 9/2/04 We're standing with you, Mr. President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: bray

Another forgery?
Exclusive interview with author.


38 posted on 09/17/2004 10:01:42 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights (What part of SHALL MAKE NO LAW do they not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

Linda's tease is over an incident in 1988 involving Rather


39 posted on 09/17/2004 10:01:47 AM PDT by Crazieman (Hanoi John Effin Kerry. War Criminal. Traitor. Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baseballmom

Ollie has been all over that one.


40 posted on 09/17/2004 10:02:13 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights (What part of SHALL MAKE NO LAW do they not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson