Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mcg1969

The BIG Deal in my mind is this citation was clearly produced at a later time. The BIG DEAL also is WHY? Was it to edit something out, like going behind hooch which in 1996 Kerry announced did not ever happen? Has anyone ever seen the Hyman citation prior to say, 2000? Has Kerry ever given an explanation to why he has THREE citations for the same award?


78 posted on 09/11/2004 7:34:31 PM PDT by The Bandit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: The Bandit

The original, Hyland memo? Clearly produced at a later time? NONSENSE. What is your evidence? If you say its justification, I'm gonna come over there and slap you. (Just kidding about that.)


79 posted on 09/11/2004 7:38:59 PM PDT by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: The Bandit

Seriously, the justification argument has been blown out of the water. 3 other examples from the same time period have been produced on this very thread showing that professional justification was commonplace on such awards. And the fact that all 3 used different typefaces makes it reasonable to believe that yet another typeface was employed on Kerry's.

So again you have no typographical evidence that this memo was not produced in its proper timeframe.


80 posted on 09/11/2004 7:41:18 PM PDT by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: The Bandit

I will say of course that the existence of 3 different versions is a serious mystery.


81 posted on 09/11/2004 7:43:22 PM PDT by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson