Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chimp-sized hominid walked upright on two legs 6 million years ago
Pennsylvania State University ^ | 02 September 2004 | News Office Staff

Posted on 09/05/2004 4:09:47 PM PDT by PatrickHenry

Recent fossil evidence suggests that a hominid, the size of a chimp, walked upright on two legs in Kenya's Tugen Hills, over 6 million years ago --- about 3 million years earlier than "Lucy," the most famous early biped in our lineage.

Dr. Robert Eckhardt, professor of developmental genetics and evolutionary morphology, Laboratory of Comparative Morphology and Mechanics (LCMM), Department of Kinesiology at Penn State, led the U.S. research team responsible for analysis of the CT scans of the internal structure of the fossil bone. Eckhardt says, "We have solid evidence of the earliest upright posture and bipedalism securely dated to six million years."

The evidence is detailed in the current (Sept. 3) issue of Science in a report, "External and Internal Morphology of the BAR 1002'00 Orrorin tugenensis Femur." Eckhardt's co-authors are [omitted numerous names, see original article if you're interested].

The fossil the team studied is part of a left thighbone unearthed nearly four years ago by Senut and Pickford at their dig in the Kenyan Lukeino Formation. The fragment includes the intact head of the left thighbone -- the ball that is inserted into the hip socket joint -- plus the bony neck that connects the ball to the thighbone shaft as well as part of the thighbone shaft.

Measurements, chiefly carried out by Dr. Galik, show that the fossil bone is about the same size as a chimpanzee's. However, CT scans of the interior of the bone reveal that the neck connecting the ball to the shaft is thinner on top than it is on the bottom, a sign the researchers say that the individual from which it came walked on two legs.

Eckhardt says, "In present day chimps and gorillas, the thicknesses in the upper and lower parts of that bone are approximately equal. In modern humans, the bone on top is thinner than on the bottom by a ratio of one to four or more. The ratio in this fossil is one to three."

The ratio in the fossil is evidence for transition to an upright posture and habitual bipedal gait the researchers argue. In addition, Eckhardt notes, because walking upright is the essential mark of a hominid, the ratio is functional evidence that the bones fossilized at Lukeino were from hominids.

The researchers write, "In known features, external and internal, BR1002'00 exhibits a total morphological pattern distinct from African apes, diagnostic of bipedal locomotion and appropriate for a population standing at the dawn of the human lineage."

The imaging research was supported, in part, by grants from the American Philosophical Society and from Sigma Xi.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: crevolist; darwin; evolution; hominid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: PatrickHenry

I found your post.


21 posted on 09/05/2004 7:33:07 PM PDT by bondserv (Alignment is critical! †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
The thread's already moved to "Chat."

My Home page is the "All of the above forums" page for this very reason. FR is getting like MSM when it comes to creation-evoution debates.

22 posted on 09/05/2004 7:37:37 PM PDT by bondserv (Alignment is critical! †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

All evolutionary assumptions aside, this finding would put upright posture at the base of the human family tree, right? This doesn't leave much time for bipedalism to evolve when the supposed human/ape-like ancestor divergence occurred b/w 5 and 8 mya (by some estimates).


23 posted on 09/07/2004 8:45:31 AM PDT by Michael_Michaelangelo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
The obligatory picture.


24 posted on 09/07/2004 8:48:56 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael_Michaelangelo
We had a thread maybe two months ago about a monkey which went fully bipedal simply as a behavioral adaptation following stomach trouble. OK, its skeleton would not show much effect, maybe eventually some wear-and-tear differences--from this. Nevertheless, I don't think going fully bipedal is that hard if that's all you're doing. If anything, this is further evidence that full bipedalism preceded other changes leading to humans.
25 posted on 09/07/2004 1:43:01 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Nevertheless, I don't think going fully bipedal is that hard if that's all you're doing.

Indeed. :)


26 posted on 09/09/2004 9:26:50 AM PDT by Michael_Michaelangelo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson