Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Battle Between Bubbles Might Have Started Evolution
Howard Hughes Medical Institute via AScribe Newswire ^ | 02 September 2004 | Staff

Posted on 09/03/2004 6:49:50 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-122 next last
To: JoeBob255

Each body in the Solar System has a unique composition of certain isotopes in certain proportions. By comparing the composition of the meteorite with the known compositions of the planets, researchers can determine the origin of the rock.


61 posted on 09/03/2004 12:13:51 PM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: WKB
When modern science can't even predict the weather a couple of days in advance, it is foolish to think that it can figure out the origin of the universe.

When science can't even predict the location or vector of a quantum particle, it is foolish to think it can figure out how to make an electric light.

62 posted on 09/03/2004 12:23:38 PM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer; Junior
There was a time when I would
argue about such matters with people .

I would let it bother me to the point
my blood pressure would get too high.
I have since matured and now
I just pray for you.
May GOD bless you and keep you and all your loved ones
through out eternity.
63 posted on 09/03/2004 12:42:38 PM PDT by WKB (3! ~ Psa. 12 8 The wicked freely strut about when what is vile is honored among men.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: WKB

Thank you for your prayers.


64 posted on 09/03/2004 2:04:15 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
I don't see the point of this "research" -- you can't prove it empirically or theoretically -- it would always remain speculation. Hence, there's no point in doing this -- leave the idea of creation to religion

I can agree with small-scale evolution -- wolves to dogs etc. but taking that and trying to extrapolate backwards is like taking a piece of the small toe bone of a man's skeleton and trying to picture what he looked like
65 posted on 09/03/2004 4:45:45 PM PDT by Cronos (W2K4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
My DSL connection blew out today. I think it's related to my upgrade to Windows Service Pack 2 this morning. Anyway, I'm here on dial up until Bellsouth sends me an upgraded modem.

After waiting what now seems an agonizing amount of time for the thread to load, I find an incredible amount of truly worthless posts. Things are going downhill.

Anyway, even if Frances doesn't bounce me offline, Microsoft seems to have done so, just about.

66 posted on 09/03/2004 5:43:15 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (The internet on a dial-up connection is as bad as it gets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ikka

One question: where did the genetic material come from.

This couldn't be first life, it would be later life.

Genetic material implies life by definition. In organic material does not have genes.


67 posted on 09/03/2004 6:36:45 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (Kerry/Edwards. Between the two of them, I'd be safer with a slimy spitball.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED
Genetic material implies life by definition.

So if I create some DNA in a test tube from inorganic chemicals, am I a god?

68 posted on 09/03/2004 7:21:07 PM PDT by balrog666 ("One man's theology is another man's belly laugh." -- Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Anyway, I'm here on dial up until .....

At long last, the playing field has been levelled.

;-)

69 posted on 09/03/2004 8:32:09 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
I find an incredible amount of truly worthless posts. Things are going downhill.

You just figured this out?

70 posted on 09/03/2004 8:39:36 PM PDT by LogicWings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Thanks for the ping!


71 posted on 09/03/2004 10:52:00 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
What the hell, this is too good an opening, so I'll throw them both out.

Tiny bubbles....

and

I didn't know Lawrence Welk and his champagne music were that old!
72 posted on 09/03/2004 11:09:20 PM PDT by RJS1950
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB

Yes, you're not troubled by the fact that you are so arrogant as to claim to know that a statement is false without even reading it.


73 posted on 09/04/2004 1:47:51 AM PDT by Dimensio (Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://www.aa419.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
evolution is one of the strongest and most useful scientific theories we have.



Evolution is BS
74 posted on 09/04/2004 6:18:38 AM PDT by WKB (3! ~ Psa. 12 8 The wicked freely strut about when what is vile is honored among men.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: WKB

In a controversy so filled with verbose obfuscations and long-winded fallacies, your insistence on only putting forth exceptionally concise non sequiturs is refreshing!


75 posted on 09/04/2004 9:58:26 AM PDT by aNYCguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: WKB
Evolution is BS

Well, that clears it all up. Sure, evolution might have more than 150 years of research and evidence backing it up, but here we have you saying, out of the blue, "Evolution is BS" without you even making the slightest attempt to refute any of the evidence for it, so clearly it must be false, in the same way that a person can falsify Christianity by saying that "Christianity is BS".
76 posted on 09/04/2004 11:18:19 AM PDT by Dimensio (Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://www.aa419.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
"We proposed that the genetic material could drive the growth of cells just by virtue of being there,"

Somebody has to ask: How did they "get there?"

77 posted on 09/04/2004 11:21:05 AM PDT by Old Professer (The enemy is among us; he is us; we know it, we dare not say it - someone will be offended.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Placemarker.


78 posted on 09/04/2004 11:30:59 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (The internet on a dial-up connection is as bad as it gets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Placemarker.

Placemarkers are BS.

< /gratuitous assertion mode>

79 posted on 09/04/2004 11:40:27 AM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio

Well, that clears it all up


Well thank you
I am glad we now agree
Evolution is BS


80 posted on 09/04/2004 12:13:11 PM PDT by WKB (3! ~ Psa. 12 8 The wicked freely strut about when what is vile is honored among men.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson