Posted on 07/31/2004 4:19:16 PM PDT by Momaw Nadon
Intel has decided to push back the launch date for its 4-GHz Pentium 4 desktop processor to the first quarter of 2005, after reviewing its launch schedules and determining it would not be able to introduce the product in sufficient volume, a company spokesperson says.
President and Chief Operating Officer Paul Otellini first told financial analysts last year that Intel would raise the clock speed of the company's flagship Pentium 4 processor to 4 GHz by the end of 2004. There are no manufacturing or design issues behind the delay, like the ones that have recently caused Intel to recall and delay some of its chipsets, says Bill Kircos, an Intel spokesperson.
"In light of the current environment, we are reviewing our product schedules top to bottom. To get to the volume we want to [with the 4GHz Pentium 4], we are telling [our customers] we're moving to a Q1 launch date," Kircos says.
Intel historically has been known for its design and manufacturing precision, but it has not lived up to that billing this year. Both of its initial 90-nanometer products, the Prescott desktop chip and the Dothan mobile chip, were delayed past their originally scheduled launch dates. The launch of the Grantsdale chipset, which Intel called one of its most important product launches in years, was marred by a manufacturing glitch that forced the recall of certain chip sets. And Sonoma, Intel's code name for the next generation of its Centrino mobile technology, has been delayed after Intel identified design problems in the chip set. Calling for Change
The company's recent performance prompted a memo from Chief Executive Officer Craig Barrett to employees last week calling for changes in the way Intel rolls out its new products.
"This is not the Intel we all know and that is not acceptable," Barrett wrote.
Barrett clearly is not pleased with Intel's recent performance, and the company will probably grow more conservative with its future launch schedules, says Nathan Brookwood, principal analyst with Insight 64, in Saratoga, California.
"I think it's a consequence of Craig Barrett having laid down the law to Intel last week that he didn't want any more broken schedules. When management says, 'Meeting your schedules is a priority,' then the natural outgrowth of that is people make more conservative schedules," Brookwood says.
"I think there must be some sort of amnesty program. If your schedule is in trouble, this is the time to admit rather than the month before it's due," Brookwood says. "You can finesse a lot of stuff, but if you said you were going to have 4 GHz by the end for the year and you don't, somebody is going to pick up on it."
Brookwood says he doesn't expect a sudden raft of revised schedules, but that it is not surprising that a high-profile product such as this would see a schedule change.
I'm assuming that they will suspend the white-hot chip in a magnetic field, since anything the chip touches will burst into flames or melt.
The real cause of global warming has been identified!
Still have plenty of the 3GHz in stock, no doubt.
Intel is certainly not alone in having problems going to 90nm. There isn't a manufacturer out there that isn't having difficulties with the yield rates. Moore's law just hit a roadblock . . .
You're actually pushing forward the release date.
You are pushing it back further into the future.
I hear that, and I'm not just picking on Intel. AMD and others have the same problems as you've stated.
I'm no nanotech wizard, but there has to be a way. Maybe I chose the wrong field, no?
Marty McFly Logic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
