Skip to comments.
If Iraqis in photos weren't naked, would there be a firestorm? So, is firestorm about clothes?
Posted on 05/10/2004 5:07:19 PM PDT by motife
just asking...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: moveittochat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
05/10/2004 5:07:19 PM PDT
by
motife
To: motife
Somebody should photo-shop the pix and put kiddie pajamas on them. Then release them to al Jazeera.
2
posted on
05/10/2004 5:10:01 PM PDT
by
Argus
To: motife
Yeah, where's Victoria's Secret when you need them ;-)
3
posted on
05/10/2004 5:10:06 PM PDT
by
pookie18
To: motife
Very good point. I would have to say no.
But if the rape reports are true (I pray they are not) then my answer does not cover this.
To: motife
Of the few pictures I have seen, they would still be offensive.
To: motife
6
posted on
05/10/2004 5:11:04 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: motife
No it is not about them being naked.
It is about MPs interacting with prisoners in an inappropriate manner and possibly some of them physically abusing them.
7
posted on
05/10/2004 5:13:33 PM PDT
by
CyberCowboy777
(Veritas vos liberabit)
To: motife
I have been wondering, if there had been no sexual aspect to all of this, whether there would be such "outrage" by so many.
To: motife
No, it's not about nudity. The press was in an uproar about the guy that had panties on his head, too.
9
posted on
05/10/2004 5:14:42 PM PDT
by
gitmo
(Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
To: motife
I would not have wanted the American prisoners on Hanan Island (sp?) to have been held naked by the Chinese ...
I understand the need for interrogation, and possibly forceful ... nonetheless, these "hijinks" photographs were totally inappropriate ...
10
posted on
05/10/2004 5:15:17 PM PDT
by
Bobby777
To: motife
It's all about liberals being scared by those silly hoods.
To: Paul Atreides
Sen. John (support Dem. Chuck Robb over Rep. Oliver North) Warner said today the "torture" at Abu Gharib was the worst in history.
12
posted on
05/10/2004 5:15:49 PM PDT
by
motife
To: motife
No, the firestorm is about war crimes. What happened in those pictures would be serious felonies in civilian life and could only be done by people that had decided that the victims were sub-human. This is a danger in war but it surely is the responsibility of the officers to keep things in check. If it turns out that some officers ordered the activity, then international war crime trials will be appropriate.
13
posted on
05/10/2004 5:18:43 PM PDT
by
Mike4Freedom
(Freedom is the one thing that you cannot have unless you grant it to everyone else.)
To: motife
said today the "torture" at Abu Gharib was the worst in history.
ummm, please tell me there aren't more photographs that show something much, much worse ... as improper as it was, it hardly compares to Adolph Hitler, the PLO, Stalin or Saddam Hussein, just to name a few ...
14
posted on
05/10/2004 5:18:56 PM PDT
by
Bobby777
To: motife
The pirannha are circling.
To: Mike4Freedom
It's only a war crime if Americans do it.
To: motife
If these prisoners had been killed before incarceration, there perhaps would be less outrage than keeping them alive and abusing them. An analogy is abortion; if a fetus is killed that's the way it goes, but if a baby is abused, that is an outrage and a crime...
Nobody wants any innocent person abused, the question here is to what the level of innocence do prisoners have, weighted against the price of shame they have to suffer and are mere mortals able to make that decision?
To any casual observer this prisoner abuse was more than what fitted their crimes, at least by international standards. However, there are many injustice in this world, and with only a limited number of resources, it would seem that there should be a priority of injustices that need to be corrected with more effort than others. Why should alleged criminals of a foreign country whom we are at war with be the first place we start and take up so much energy and debate, how bout the unjustness that exist in our own country suffered by law biding citizens, where is the outrage and time spent on them compared to these prisoners?
What about the young US soldiers who have lost limbs, or families of solders who have lost loved ones? Where is the outrage that Iraq did not follow international law, by allowing full and complete inspections, and which resulted in these abuses of our own innocent citizens?
It seems then, the only people in the world who are worthy of having their plight brought to the attention of world opinion are those whose remedy will help elect or take down a politician or government.
17
posted on
05/10/2004 5:53:51 PM PDT
by
seastay
To: Bobby777
Well, the photos that have not been shown reportedly depict prisoners mauled by attack dogs, prisoners beaten to the verge of death, guards raping women, guards raping teenage boys, and guards engaging in "improprieties" with corpses...
18
posted on
05/10/2004 6:27:50 PM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
To: AntiGuv
OMG ... no offense (understand what I'm saying) but I hope that is wrong ... good grief ...
19
posted on
05/10/2004 8:44:29 PM PDT
by
Bobby777
To: Bobby777
I also hope that is wrong. I'm having a real tough time accepting all of this. The depth of depravity in the allegations is just stunning to me. I can't understand how it could have come to this if it did...
20
posted on
05/10/2004 8:55:59 PM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson