To: stands2reason
Thinking about it, who else have they got?For Bond, you mean? That's what I'm wondering. I can't think of anybody who fits the part better than Brosnan, so I don't know who else they'd pick. Part of the trick to Bond is that he has to be in good shape but can't have too big a build, which rules out the broader-built action types like Bruce Willis, etc. Mel Gibson's got certain aspects of it, but comes with too many associations from previous movies, and his personality doesn't quite fit. Hmmm. . .Maybe Val Kilmer?--if he wasn't so hard to work with on the set.
To: Fedora
Val Kilmer's a good choice for Bond, IMO - his role in "The Saint" was somewhat similar. (But cooler than Bond!)
What about someone who doesn't always do action parts? Like the guy who played the president in Independence Day.
1,744 posted on
03/19/2004 7:19:12 PM PST by
JenB
To: Fedora
Mel Gibson's got certain aspects of it, but comes with too many associations from previous movies, and his personality doesn't quite fit. Too tan, rugged. And (sorry ladies) too short.
Hmmm. . .Maybe Val Kilmer?--if he wasn't so hard to work with on the set.
I think Bond really does need to be at least somewhat British.
1,752 posted on
03/19/2004 7:25:03 PM PST by
stands2reason
( During the cola wars, France was occupied by Pepsi for six months.)
To: Fedora
Is Hugh Jackman British?
1,754 posted on
03/19/2004 7:26:51 PM PST by
stands2reason
( During the cola wars, France was occupied by Pepsi for six months.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson