Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ZOT!!! I always cry at zottings.
2-18-04 | Bob Gold

Posted on 02/18/2004 4:09:02 PM PST by Bob Gold

I'm an Orthodox Jew and have been skeptical about the entire marriage debate. Jewish law does not recognize ANY marriage that includes a non-Jew, whatever the genders. The Bible, of course, never describes marriage except for the obligations of divorce if a man has "taken awife/woman." I was amazed, though, by my own reactions to the joy, peace and conviction of the gay couples I have seen getting married. I wept. I have searched my heart and mind for any conservative value that conflicts with acts of assuming responsibility for another person and a relationship under law that I have seen.

Am I the only religious conservative to have had such a revelation or are there others who have been forced to rethink their beliefs by experiences like these? I am not trying to convince anyone of anything or have an argument. I am just deeply moved and very confused about my sense of the total rightness of what these people are doing and my inability to justify my belief that the practice is absurd.

Bob


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 10acrebutt; albatross; barkingmoonbat; bobmarriesrob; dusrupter; homosexualagenda; jalathejihadgerbil; janemarriessusie; jaroftrollsouls; kittenchow; lyingliar; nealandbob; needanotherzot; nosegold; samesexmarriage; sofakingweetodded; strikeupthebanned; thisaccountisbanned; trollsinmyshorts; trollvanity; vanityinanity; vkpac; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: Bob Gold

Take a hike, supposed "conservative." I'm getting married in about a week and a half and I'm appalled by the mocking of the commitment I'm making by these queers. They can live happily back in the closet. I've had it with being "accepting" of their lifestyle.

21 posted on 02/18/2004 4:16:16 PM PST by Future Snake Eater ("Oh boy, I can't wait to eat that monkey!"--Abe Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Gold
Am I the only religious conservative to have had such a revelation or are there others who have been forced to rethink their beliefs by experiences like these?

Good question. I vote for you being the only religious pseudoconservative to have had such a pseudorevelation.

22 posted on 02/18/2004 4:16:42 PM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl
We're going to be seeing a whole lot of Moby Trolls in the coming months. Here, talk radio, all over. The good news is the real Rats are defining their party and the people are getting sick of them, their lies and tactics and their agendas. There's a new wind a blowin'....
23 posted on 02/18/2004 4:17:03 PM PST by eureka! (Hey Rats and Presstitutes, how's the turnout in the primaries? *snicker*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bob Gold

Poof!
24 posted on 02/18/2004 4:18:10 PM PST by LuigiBasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
I cried at the last gay wedding I attended. The decor at the reception hall was soooooo gauche!

LOL! What a hoot!

25 posted on 02/18/2004 4:21:10 PM PST by TheGeezer (If only I had skin as thick as Ann Coulter, and but half her intelligence...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Bob Gold
I wept.

Yea?

Well so did this phoney


26 posted on 02/18/2004 4:24:50 PM PST by Neets (Complainers change their complaints, but they never reduce the amount of time spent in complaining.~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Gold
Bob:

Thank you for your thoughtful post. I hope you are not automatically flamed.

Your passionate struggle with this difficult issue is understandable.

There are many here who will talk about the act, the sin etc. All of which are legitimate concerns. In the end, the issue is really about a state's right to set a standard of preferred activity, and to reward that activity with privileges consistent with a desire to create incentives. Plainly stated, the state still rightfully see the best family circumstance as one that involves the marriage of a man and a woman, living together, educated, and raising a family. Statistically, that group provides the best benefit to the state and society, irrespective of the tons of examples where the norm is bad.

Marriage, is a privilege. The state cannot and does not, and should not prevent people from living how they wish. Unmarried couples may cohabitate. People may live together and care for each other with out sex, e.g. brothers and sisters, and gays and lesbians may live together as well. But, when a group comes to the state, and asks for a special recognition, the state should have the right to determine who should receive such a recognition.

Discrimination would be preventing couple from living together. That is different from such a couple looking for special recognition and benefits.

I know gay and lesbian couples that live productive lives and are community servants. I know married couples who should be jailed for what they have done to each other and their children. Thus, when a couple dedicate themselves to each other, and treat each other with respect. I think that is great. BUT, I still believe a state has the right to set a high standard in an effort to encourage and give support to the best possible family circumstance. Accordingly, gay "marriage" conflicts with the states ability to do that. In my principled opinion, this is no different than denying benefits and privileges to those who cohabitate, or even those that live and care for each other in a platonic relationship. Those relationships do not rise to the standard that we try to set for our communities.

That is why this issue is so tough for those of us that look at the issue dispassionately. This coming from a pro-life, conservative, married catholic father of three.

Regards
27 posted on 02/18/2004 4:24:59 PM PST by Iron Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
People are always crying at weddings. There must be a reason.

It's a normal reaction to tragedy.

28 posted on 02/18/2004 4:34:41 PM PST by Slings and Arrows (Am Yisrael Chai!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bob Gold
I have searched my heart and mind for any conservative value that conflicts with acts of assuming responsibility for another person and a relationship under law that I have seen.

I might be just a lowly Catholic, but don't Jews obey G-d's law?

29 posted on 02/18/2004 4:39:39 PM PST by grellis (Che cosa ha mangiato?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
Oy vey! You don't sound authentically verklempt to be a real Jew -- but the Jewish-sounding name was a nice (albeit somewhat heavyhanded) touch.

Maybe he goes to shul with David Goldman.

30 posted on 02/18/2004 4:40:34 PM PST by Slings and Arrows (Am Yisrael Chai!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
Maybe he goes to shul with David Goldman.

You have done something very rare; you've left me speechless...

31 posted on 02/18/2004 4:45:49 PM PST by NYC GOP Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
You have done something very rare; you've left me speechless...

Is that a good thing or a bad thing?

Maybe we should turn this "Bob Gold" schmuck over to the Neturei Carta. Talk about a win-win scenario!

32 posted on 02/18/2004 4:52:45 PM PST by Slings and Arrows (Am Yisrael Chai!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
Is that a good thing or a bad thing?

It's such a rare occurence, I'm not really sure!

Maybe we should turn this "Bob Gold" schmuck over to the Neturei Carta. Talk about a win-win scenario!

Good plan!

33 posted on 02/18/2004 4:56:45 PM PST by NYC GOP Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Neets
There ought to be a law against starting comments with the "I am a _____, but _____".

What is missing is the usual dead giveaway: "I've been lurking on this forum for years..."

34 posted on 02/18/2004 5:00:32 PM PST by grellis (Che cosa ha mangiato?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater
Congratulations on the upcoming nuptials! Are we having an open bar???
35 posted on 02/18/2004 5:01:48 PM PST by grellis (Che cosa ha mangiato?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: grellis
Thanks!

Not just an open bar, a three hour open bar!

36 posted on 02/18/2004 5:06:29 PM PST by Future Snake Eater ("Oh boy, I can't wait to eat that monkey!"--Abe Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jriemer
Whoops we missed this "zot lite"...
37 posted on 02/18/2004 5:14:48 PM PST by petuniasevan (When professors want your opinion, they'll give it to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Gold
I'm an Orthodox Jew

Yeah, and I'm the Grand Duchess Anastasia

38 posted on 02/18/2004 7:03:39 PM PST by Alouette (Atlantis -- the Real Palestinian State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Gold
ZOTs of luck, Bob


39 posted on 02/18/2004 7:54:13 PM PST by Professional Engineer (Chief recruiting officer, BicycleSpankenTruppen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Gold
I don't understand it, a ZOT and no kitties?

It seems such a waste!!!

40 posted on 02/18/2004 8:42:41 PM PST by Not now, Not ever! (/o/o//oo (Oh Nooooooooo... It looks like somebody ran over it!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson