Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rface
>they simply minimize the killing, portraying it as >another part of the overall death toll of World War II >rather than the systematic extermination campaign that it >was.

Hey, call me antisemetic, but is it so wrong to say that EVERY life lost was just as important? Are they saying that a jew's life is worth more then say, someone who starved in the Ukraine? Both were deaths as a result of the war... Both were wrong. Both were unnecessary.
39 posted on 02/16/2004 8:18:33 AM PST by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sandbar
Hey, call me antisemetic,

Yeah...that would do a lot of good.

but is it so wrong to say that EVERY life lost was just as important?

Yes, it is...depending on the life. For example, do you mourn the murder of a concentration camp guard who died during an uprising at the end of the war equally with the Jew he murdered during the uprising? Is it "self-defense" because the Jews were rioting?

Are they saying that a jew's life is worth more then say, someone who starved in the Ukraine?

Depends on how the Ukrainian lived his life. Doesn't it? If he starved to death because he gave his last morsel of bread to a Jewish child he was hiding, then the answer to your question is that the lives of each are equally important. If, on the other hand, he starved to death because he was part of the Ukrainian police who persecuted Jews during the Holocaust and he starved to death in prison, then I don't have too much sympathy for him.

Feel free to disagree.

42 posted on 02/16/2004 8:29:12 AM PST by h.a. cherev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson