[realpatriot71]

He also said, what you have seen in secret, what you have heard whispered in the ear, that shout from the housetops. What had been esoteric or private, he was all in favour of making Public. Too bad he didn't have the Internet, but then he has me to put it up here for him

So you take his silence in the NT on the subject, and assume that he meant to say "this" or "that" but didn't? How can one assume the position of a person when said person has been completely silent on the matter? It makes no sense. Paul's silence on the matter is NOT some sort of blank check allowing one to fill in the "blanks" at will.

[Chris Talk]

No, I wouldn't assume any more than what he does say. I just know from THAT, however, that he was a kabbalist.

Just an attempted joke about the Internet... but I wouldn't presume that he agreed any more with QBLH than what he plainly does do, from his writings.

The QBLH is so voluminous that one could prove almost ANY thing from it; I only know a few of the better known items and passages. It isn't a big thing of mine.