[Chris Talk]

No, I wouldn't assume any more than what he does say. I just know from THAT, however, that he was a kabbalist.

Just an attempted joke about the Internet... but I wouldn't presume that he agreed any more with QBLH than what he plainly does do, from his writings.

The QBLH is so voluminous that one could prove almost ANY thing from it; I only know a few of the better known items and passages. It isn't a big thing of mine.

[realpatriot71]

I just know from THAT, however, that he was a kabbalist.

It's probably more correct to say Paul was familiar with Jewish mysticism, but insisting that Paul was, since his conversion on the road to Damascus, a "Kabbalist" is infering and assuming TOO much. No support for this idea.

I wouldn't presume that he agreed any more with QBLH than what he plainly does do, from his writings

This seems fair enough.