To: truthandlife
Looks like Mel's getting a little thin on top. The chicks'll still dig him.
16 posted on
02/09/2004 8:43:28 AM PST by
Huck
(Where there's smoke, there's mirrors.)
To: Huck
< Looks like Mel's getting a little thin on top. The chicks'll still dig him. >
Why shouldn't we "dig" him? Sexy is sexy. Hair or no hair. Have you forgotten Sean Connery? We women have stayed with him thru hair, little hair, toops and almost no hair. Again, sexy is sexy.
21 posted on
02/09/2004 9:19:21 AM PST by
GOP_Proud
(Those who preach tolerance seem to have the least for my views.)
To: Huck
Looks like Mel's getting a little thin on top. The chicks'll still dig him.
**
For most women past the age of 22, a full head of hair is not a requirement for attractiveness. Actually, at one time I considered Gibson a little too pretty, but the more I learn about his character, the more attractive he becomes to me.
44 posted on
02/09/2004 11:20:40 AM PST by
Bigg Red
(Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
To: Huck
Mel is aging quite nicely, isn't he, ladies!
55 posted on
02/09/2004 6:52:37 PM PST by
Ciexyz
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson