I have no problem with Rush. And I am not 'trying to get a response'. I am stating my opinion. My problem with those that claim to be his 'friends'. What they are doing is quite a disservice to him by attacking the prosecutor. Not that the prosecutor doesn't deserve to be questioned about selective prosecution, but these idiots are inflaming things and are going to end up getting Rush absolutely no mercy from this guy. Does that make sense?
And I abhor the fact that some of his friends prance around here trying to make the prosecutor the scapegoat for responding to one organizations idiotic and foolish request for documents. That request opened this whole can of worms and exposed Rush's private matters for all to see. For that Mr Levin need to be held accountable.
My problem is with you and your ilk on this particular thread!
There are various threads discussing Rush's ALLEGED indiscretions but this one ain't it! UNDERSTAND???????
You and your anti-Rush comments are not welcome here on this thread, this is not what this thread was started for.
Let me put it in perspective for the dimwitted around here:
This is ClintonBeGone's birthday thread so let's all of us anti-ClintonBeGone folks stop by and deposit our excrement just to spoil his party...........
My understanding is that LLF requested copies of what was already given to the Sun-Sentinel. The damage was already done--and LLF wanted to know what was handed around, and to get the prosecutor on record. It seems to me the right thing to do. Rush's private matters were already NOT private, before Levin ever involved himself as an interested 3rd party.
The prosecutor IS the scapegoat in this, because he should not have handed out the info to begin with--and then lied about who told him it was okay to do it. I came to these threads late, so it's very possible I missed something. If I did, please feel free to point out what I've gotten wrong. Otherwise, I'll stick by my opinions. Don't take our disagreement personally, please. I still like you as an anonymous ID!