You mean because I'm the one telling it and you need for it to be a lie to prove yourself right?
Here you amend your comments to say she swore under oath twice for times you were present. You did not say that before either.
Exactly HOW does the fact that I left out the part where she swore under oath twice make that a lie?
It does not make that a lie. It puts doubt into the equation. You keep amending your story. I don't find it credible but it doesn't mean that parts of even all of it are not true.
No, I mean because you don't sound credible telling this story. You leave out key facts. You add them in later. I really don't know whether to take you seriously. That would be for a district attorney's office to decide.