Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: general_re
When such dubious assumptions buried in the argument are crucial for the support of the conclusion, the argument is bad and can be very misleading.

Rand identified what may be a variant of this, and called it the "fallacy of the stolen concept." An example is the Marxist mantra that "property is theft." The whole idea that theft is wrong can't be maintained without acceptance of the concept of property.

4 posted on 12/29/2003 9:02:38 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Hic amor, haec patria est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry
Interesting - the statement itself is self-contradictory.
5 posted on 12/29/2003 9:12:40 AM PST by general_re ("You shouldn't treat people like objects. They aren't that valuable." - P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
An example is the Marxist mantra that "property is theft."

... Of what? Of itself? Good one on Ayn! Never noticed the fallacy there.

7 posted on 12/29/2003 10:14:47 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
'Property is theft'

Can't one just say, 'No it isn't'?

Or, 'Prove it?'

In regards to the above discussion these are what I call rhetorical questions, or statements disguised as a question.

Anytime somebody says, 'Don't you think that...' I say, that is not a question. You are making a statment. Make it if you like. I am not interested in making a counter-statement.
11 posted on 12/29/2003 6:49:10 PM PST by squarebarb (post number 219, just trying to get my numbers up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson