To: All
Am I the only one that was disturbed by the scene where robo-chick kills the baby in the stroller?
255 posted on
12/09/2003 10:18:05 AM PST by
Woahhs
To: Woahhs
No,it was unnecssary and prurient IMO (as were all of the sex scenes).
258 posted on
12/09/2003 10:22:18 AM PST by
BenLurkin
(Socialism is Slavery)
To: Woahhs
Am I the only one that was disturbed by the scene where robo-chick kills the baby in the stroller?Nope. It was subtle, and reinforced the menace of the chick.
262 posted on
12/09/2003 10:25:58 AM PST by
mhking
To: Woahhs
Am I the only one that was disturbed by the scene where robo-chick kills the baby in the stroller?Oh, you bet yer sweet arse! That scene made me grab my 7-month-old and give him a few dozen extra kissus!
Another view is that if you look at it and what Number 6 said to the baby, ("You won't have to cry for very much longer") she was actually doing it a favor in a twisted way: Better to die quickly than to suffer through nuclear holocaust -The Cylons nuked that whole city. --PS: Please don't flame me. I felt really bad at that scene.
286 posted on
12/09/2003 12:00:41 PM PST by
RandallFlagg
("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
To: Woahhs
Am I the only one that was disturbed by the scene where robo-chick kills the baby in the stroller? That part creeped me out. I had a feeling that something bad was going to happen after she picked up the baby. At least the killing was done where the viewer could not see it.
Up to that point, the wholly unnecessary sex scenes were the only bits that bothered me. Do these actors get paid according to how many square inches of skin are revealed?
308 posted on
12/09/2003 1:30:29 PM PST by
Garth Rockett
(Trapped in academia with no exit in sight.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson