[bert]

Weak doesn't apply to the issue. Fit or unfit applies to the ability to exist within a specific evolving ecology. The species in question was extremely fit for what must be considerable ecological variation. Thus, no change took place.

The species had evolved to a point where it was the fittest. Additional change did not improve the ability to exist.

There were changes, but the individuals exhibiting the change were not successful, not fit, did not survive.

[snowballinhell]

OK so lets see if I have this straight there is no example of evolution because... every thing has already evolved, that at no other time in history has the need to evolve stopped except for today?
You attempt to use the no current evolving species scenario to explain evolution.
I am sitting down therefore I can run 100 yards in 3 seconds- same logic.

[bondserv]

The species had evolved to a point where it was the fittest. Additional change did not improve the ability to exist.

There were changes, but the individuals exhibiting the change were not successful, not fit, did not survive.

There is more and more evidence that adaptation to an environment is preprogrammed in. The finches would adapt back and forth to the changes in conditions, suggesting it is part of their intelligently designed mechanism.

Darwin was and is wrong! Keep watching the journals. Link