To: xzins
This adds credibility to Behe's mathematical model which says outside influence was needed. Behe's model has zero credibility to a statistician. To calculate the odds of an event, you need a numerically specified state-space, and a numerically specified selection criteria within that state-space. Neither Behe, nor anyone else, has any idea whatsoever what the state-space and selection criteria actually were that produced life.
144 posted on
12/07/2003 10:15:20 AM PST by
donh
To: donh; Alamo-Girl
Oh, please.
In short, there's a million threads and a gazillion posts on FR on this subject. Both sides.
Go read them again. And again. And again.
Same old arguments.
It would be nice if someone said something different, wouldn't it? :>)
147 posted on
12/07/2003 10:28:12 AM PST by
xzins
(Proud to be Army!)
To: donh
To calculate the odds of an event, you need a numerically specified state-space, and a numerically specified selection criteria within that state-space. And to be a believer in Evolution, none of these things are required.
149 posted on
12/07/2003 11:40:32 AM PST by
Elsie
(Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson