Skip to comments.
Los Angeles Real Estate: Prudent Investment or Insanity?
Self
| 11/18/2003
| David H Dennis
Posted on 11/18/2003 2:48:18 PM PST by daviddennis
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
To: gubamyster; daviddennis
As a self-employed I didn't think of that angle. I still think, based on what info DD provided, that his intention is admirable but ill-advised. I would give the same answer to any of my own kids, given the same circumstances.
41
posted on
11/18/2003 3:56:15 PM PST
by
wtc911
To: DumpsterDiver
Would I be correct in assuming that realtors and selling agents are doing the same job, just with different job titles? Or are there separate licenses for each, with one having more training than the other? Realtors just means you belong to the NAR. Agents & brokers can represent either (and sometimes both) the seller and the buyer. No separate license is necessary. However, there are differences between a broker license and an agent license.
To: daviddennis
In the north end of L.A. County (near the community of Gorman) there is a 3500+ square foot house on 10 acres of land in an area of big trees that touches up against Angeles National Forest land. It was on the market for 425k. Located 15 minutes from I-5, and about 45 minutes from magic mountain theme park. Lots more house for the money.
43
posted on
11/18/2003 4:00:36 PM PST
by
stumpy
To: gubamyster
OK, now I get the distinction. Thanks for taking the time to answer.
To: So Cal Rocket
When you buy, have the seller provide a "home protection policy", and then renew it when it comes due.
45
posted on
11/18/2003 4:02:14 PM PST
by
stumpy
To: daviddennis
You're buying at the top of the California housing bubble. You could be stuck with a whopper mortgage payment and a declining home value. Ouch!
Then again, some lefty California judge could declare that all private property belongs to the state and you'll get to live there rent free, ala North Korea, with all the tree bark you can eat.
46
posted on
11/18/2003 4:03:38 PM PST
by
sergeantdave
(You will be judged by 12 people who were too stupid to get out of jury duty)
To: daviddennis
Move to another state.
ANY other state.
California is a trendsetter, and it'll be the first to collapse to Third World parity.
Try Tennessee. Cost of living remains relatively reasonable.
And the TVA gives reasonable assurance that you'll still have access to fresh water and electricity, something that can't be said for California.
To: daviddennis
Similar position bump.
48
posted on
11/18/2003 4:10:01 PM PST
by
L,TOWM
(Liberals, The Other White Meat)
To: wtc911
As a self-employed I didn't think of that angle. Even as self-employed, you could reduce the quarterly estimates you currently would be making, realizing an immediate tax savings.
To: daviddennis
Get educated
www.richdad.com
Read the first 4 books - then decide.
50
posted on
11/18/2003 4:21:31 PM PST
by
taxcontrol
(People are entitled to their opinion - no matter how wrong it is.)
To: sergeantdave
I agree, I think Southern California is in the middle of a real estate bubble. I suppose if a buyer can get a 30 year fixed that they can afford, it will all turn out OK in the long-term (but in this economy, who has that kind of job security?).
Last March, the actor James Woods (who's brilliant) was telling Jay Leno that he sold his house and was renting (IIRC he told Jay he was living in a hotel). He thought the LA real estate market was crazy and was waiting for the market to drop to a more sane level before he bought again.
That would be my gut reaction. If my company moved me out to LA, I'd just rent.
51
posted on
11/18/2003 4:25:29 PM PST
by
Maximum Leader
(run from a knife, close on a gun)
To: daviddennis
There is the school of thought in California that there isn't construction underway anywhere, so values are up because of there being no availability of product.
Then there is the school of other-thought that interest rates have been kept artificially low, so though sales prices have risen, it is still cheaper than paying a 9% rate.
I am getting some additional education right now in the real estate field. I am having a series of instructors; some of which are in the appraisal field. The one tonight and my last one are highly placed within Washington Mutual.
Their thoughts were that even they can't tell you which direction RE is going for sure, but certain indicators suggest we are about to enter a cycle where prices will go down.
Everything is cyclical and for every rise of percentage points for a loan will result in lower real estate prices.
I was told you could expect perhaps 10% off the current price for EVERY 1% increase in the loan rates.
The sign that we are in the last cycle of rising prices concerns the condos. They are the last to see values rise and the first to see them drop. Well, the condos got their bump and you should look for a drop in their prices first a time before it will hit residential homes.
9% loan? I know jumbos are a bit more expensive, but I thought most residential loans were at most maybe 6.25%.
I haven't been following this, but you seem to be getting a very high rate. Maybe that is because of the nothing down. You get in for free if you pay nearly an additional 50% in loan rates. Not a deal as far as I am concerned.
Good luck, if you can make your fist home a $500,000 one you are a good money earner, though I don't understand how you have almost NO SAVINGS! That is a paradox for me.
52
posted on
11/18/2003 4:34:24 PM PST
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: sergeantdave
When interest rates rise you will see a decline in property values, no question about it. That doesn't mean that in the long run values won't increase, but to think they continually go up is nonsense. I remember one of my appraisers telling me in 1988 that we, in California, were immune to value declines due to this, that and who knows what else. Right.
53
posted on
11/18/2003 4:38:44 PM PST
by
sangoo
To: taxcontrol
You mean get F'd, he's a known fraud. For heaven's sake, the author has said that Rich Dad NEVER EXISTED. This is a fabrication and this pyramid scheme guy makes a living duping people into seminars at $3000 a pop.
Does he boast of all his bankruptcy's in those seminars? NO!
Avoid Robert T. Kiyosakis book Rich Dad, Poor Dad and others like the plague.
http://www.johntreed.com/Kiyosaki.html
54
posted on
11/18/2003 4:39:40 PM PST
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: daviddennis
I agree with you about the desirability of Topanga and its propensity to appreciate. From your emotional statements, it sounds to me like you are committed to living there. Were I you in that case, I would save my money, bide my time, befriend a banker or realtor maintain a set-up for the financing and look for a repo.
Make sure your prospective neighbors are OK with brush clearing and such or you could be buying a death trap. I would be doing the homework on learning how to care for that kind of land properly, NOW. You might want to consult with the local Resource Conservation District, Fire Marshall, and/or a well-regarded arborist for a cheap education.
I hope you know where I stand on landscaping: if you are going to introduce a non-native plant, please be responsible and make sure it can't get out of control, even if you leave.
If you are buying a fixer, how skilled are you? Else will you be able to afford a $25,000 upgrade while making those payments? Otherwise, a $500,000 place sounds like its over your head, especially with a balloon payment in a time of higher interest rates. I'd get a combination of a conforming first and an equity line of credit. It's a lot of flexibility for the future. Pay down the equity line and save it for a rainy day.
55
posted on
11/18/2003 4:43:34 PM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to manage by politics.)
To: daviddennis
self bump
56
posted on
11/18/2003 4:46:56 PM PST
by
steveo
To: daviddennis
Look, I own a .5 mil home (actually, a little more) - but I
own it in a high-growth area.
Bottom line - get out of LA.
57
posted on
11/18/2003 4:46:58 PM PST
by
patton
(I wish we could all look at the evil of abortion with the pure, honest heart of a child.)
BUMP for later
58
posted on
11/18/2003 4:48:07 PM PST
by
Pagey
(Hillary Rotten is a Smug and Holier- than- Thou Socialist)
To: MineralMan; daviddennis
Far better to purchase a dingbat at the lower end of the market, but in a decent area.Agreed. Buy the weakest house in the best neighborhood you can afford, and let the rest of the properties pull yours upward as you spruce it up.
To: Pagey
BUMP
60
posted on
11/18/2003 4:51:17 PM PST
by
Queen Jadis
(Violence against women is unapproachable. ... She was ok with it. Glorious... I WEEP IN JAIL)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson