To: jmc813
Quite frankly, given the dearth of drug threads since "you know who's" been gone (though he did sneak back a few times), I find myself surfing around FR instead of wasting time "providing evidence for my claims".
Don't you notice the difference?
To: robertpaulsen
It's usually not at all difficult to provide evidence for valid claims. When claims are unsupported by actual evidence, it's all the circumlocution and rhetorical artifice to make them appear valid that takes effort, but not so much hunting down whatever tangential fact might be distorted to appear as evidence.
Just an observation! ;^)
16 posted on
11/18/2003 11:13:26 AM PST by
AntiGuv
(When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
To: robertpaulsen
Maybe if he had an FR radio show at one time, he could abuse forum rules. It works for others! lol
17 posted on
11/18/2003 11:16:07 AM PST by
Sir Gawain
(The Koran...when you're out of toilet paper, Allah is there for you.)
To: robertpaulsen
Don't you notice the difference?Not really. You drug warriors still fail to provide evidence and never will logically answer (or even simply answer in some warriors' cases) questions related to the discussion.
20 posted on
11/18/2003 11:20:40 AM PST by
xrp
To: robertpaulsen
Do you feel his banning was warranted?
23 posted on
11/18/2003 11:34:35 AM PST by
jmc813
(Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
To: robertpaulsen
Always a good quality in a discussion board, eh? Eliminate those that disagree with you and you don't have to disagree.
26 posted on
11/18/2003 11:48:21 AM PST by
jayef
To: robertpaulsen
So you prefer that he be banned rather than you exercise restraint by not visiting the drug threads he posts? :)
43 posted on
11/18/2003 2:09:05 PM PST by
ellery
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson