Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What's Next? [Barbra Streisand feels a Chille Wynde (tm Tim Robbins-Sarandon)]
The Horse's Mouth (B.S. Website) ^ | November 10, 2003 | Barbra Streisand

Posted on 11/10/2003 5:06:59 PM PST by pogo101

Two Sundays ago, CBS broadcast their grand 75th anniversary celebration. Audiences were reminded of the rich history of a network that has, until now, put artistic integrity and principled news above politics. From I Love Lucy to Murphy Brown in the entertainment arena and from Walter Cronkite to the impressive team behind 60 Minutes in news, we have come to depend on CBS for their high quality programming. As a wonderful recent letter to the New York Times reminded me, it was Edward R. Murrow of CBS who stood up to Senator Joseph McCarthy in the 1950s, "a genuinely risky thing for Murrow to do," but also an important action that signaled the beginning of the end of McCarthyism. CBS ought to understand by now that when concerns over political consequences start to shape entertainment and news, everybody loses. We need to be able to trust our public airwaves to depict views and ideas that do not cater solely to a small but vocal minority.

It seems impossible to believe that CBS has really cancelled the airing of The Reagans - the first time in the history of television that a program has been cancelled just before airing due to political pressure. The movie will now be aired on Showtime, which is broadcast in 14 million homes versus the 108 million homes that can tune into CBS. People should be able to see this movie, or choose not to. What is the network so intimidated by? It couldn't possibly just be the suggested "boycott." If the show had aired, everybody would have probably tuned in just to see what all the fuss was about and few advertisers would want to miss out on that. One possibility, which I have seen mentioned many times, is that CBS' parent company, Viacom, is concerned about the implications for the proposed new FCC regulations that would allow them to expand their markets. Perhaps they don't want to alienate key Republican support for these FCC changes.

The potential implications of CBS' decision are scary and stifling to the creative process. Will artists now feel compelled to censor their work when dealing with any sort of controversial subject? Will it be okay to tell the truth? This is just one television movie, but the fact that the right wing now feels emboldened to go after everything it does not agree with undermines the principle of democratic debate that we all depend on in this country. One can only wonder ...what's next?


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: activistactors; antireagan; barbrastreisand; barbrastreisandsic; boycott; boycottviacom; brabrastreisand; bs; cbsnews; cbsviacom; cheeseandwhine; hillarybookdeal; hollywoodelite; kantspel; lies; lyingliars; m2; mediabias; mtv; nick; propaganda; ratherbiased; reaganbashing; ronaldreagan; seebs; shutupandsing; simonandschuester; spike; thereagans; tnn; tvland; vh1; viacom; viacommie; viacomradio; waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Yes, what's next? Perhaps next, leftists will band together to keep Dr. Laura Schlessinger from getting HER show on the air! Oh, wait, that already happened. But I'm sure Barbra was upset about that, too, right?
1 posted on 11/10/2003 5:06:59 PM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pogo101
Audiences were reminded of the rich history of a network that has, until now, put artistic integrity and principled news above politics. ___huh?
2 posted on 11/10/2003 5:08:01 PM PST by ChadsDad (Time to clean up the playground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
the impressive team behind 60 Minutes in news, we have come to depend on CBS for their high quality programming.____huh?
3 posted on 11/10/2003 5:08:32 PM PST by ChadsDad (Time to clean up the playground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
Will it be okay to tell the truth?

Oh, I don't know, Babs, why not try it and see? Just once?

4 posted on 11/10/2003 5:09:01 PM PST by Petronski (Living life in a minor key.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
Will it be okay to tell the truth? ___huh?
5 posted on 11/10/2003 5:09:26 PM PST by ChadsDad (Time to clean up the playground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist; I_be_tc; paltz; SoKatt; fishbabe; LisaMalia
Hollywood Leftist BS Ping!!!
If you wish to be added to or removed from the Hollywood Leftist Ping list, please FReepmail me.
6 posted on 11/10/2003 5:11:41 PM PST by WinOne4TheGipper (Using Occam's Razor to shave the hairy armpits of liberal feminists....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
Barbra says, “We need to be able to trust our public airwaves to depict views and ideas that do not cater solely to a small but vocal minority”.

Now Barbra won’t stand for letting minority views and ideas have a say. How facist, how Nazi, how racist, how Barbra!

7 posted on 11/10/2003 5:26:02 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101; Admin Moderator
Excuse me, but can an admin explain to me why this was relegated to solely "TV/Movies"? Seems to me its relevance goes far beyond discussing the content of a film.
8 posted on 11/10/2003 5:28:06 PM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
It really is odd that editorials about Barbra's latest rants about The Reagans can appear in the main FR page.

I searched for this idiotorial earlier today and didn't see it posted (I held off on posting it). I didn't even consider searching "General Interest" (land of moose and cheese). At least it did appear on the sidebar (otherwise I would have missed it completely).

9 posted on 11/10/2003 6:10:23 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
The potential implications of CBS' decision are scary and stifling to the creative process. Will artists now feel compelled to censor their work....

Oh the horrors...artists will now have to tell the truth when they try to do a character assassination. This is just horrible.

10 posted on 11/10/2003 7:20:24 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson