To: Nemo1USA
>>>Natural disaster happen, and hopefully people are aware, and can cope till help arrives. That is a taught reaction, it does not come easy to Americans.
I'm extremely annoyed with this statement. Since I don't want to take this thread off topic, I am going to ignore it.
I think it is SAFE to assume you don't live in the tristate area. Coping came very easy for us.
You type with an accent. What is your first language?
6,583 posted on
01/05/2004 9:54:44 AM PST by
Calpernia
(Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
To: Calpernia
I just came across this.
EmergencyNet News - Intellegence Info Warns of Likely WMD attack on CONUS
05 Jan 2004
Intelligence Information Warns WMD Chemical Attack Likely
WASHINGTON, DC: The U.S. intelligence community remains concerned that a Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) attack using chemical weapons will be launched against CONUS (Continental United States) in the near future, with small, well-defined and easily accessible targets most at risk.
In various reports, the intelligence community has noted that for many Middle Eastern terrorist groups, the use of WMDs are no longer considered a last-resort option and could be used at any time the desired effect of a WMD is needed.
In the past, the use of chemical weapons in particular have resulted in limited casualties. Adulterated sarin gas was used in the 1995 Tokyo subway system attack resulting in limited number of deaths and several thousands sickened.
Despite British think-tank assessments to the contrary (1) ERRI senior analyst Clark Staten said that no lesss than Usama Bin Laden himself has previously condoned the acquisition and deployment of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD).(2) Staten said that documents recovered at Al-Qaeda safe-houses and training bases in Afghanistan suggest a strong interest to obtain and use Chemical, Biological, Nuclear, and Radiological (CBRN) weapons. To make matters worse, Staten said that the convergence of WMD's and the increasing use of "suicide homicide/suicide" attackers is likely to increase the threat of some sort of use of CBRN weapons.(3)
U.S. intelligence believes that, if given the chance, Al-Qaeda would take the opportunity to use CBRN agents. Many experts agree that problems still exist for terrorist groups to deliver chemical agents to their targets, but they also agree that an attack on
CONUS was still likely in the near future regardless.
According to the FBI, various Palestinian, Islamic groups and extremist groups within the U.S. and Europe are most likely to use chemical weapons. Similar groups in South America and Western Europe were unlikely to do so, intelligences sources told
EmergencyNet News.
In order of likelihood of occurrence (as determined by an ERRI WMD threat assessment) :
1> Conventional Explosives
2> Chemical
3> Biological
4> Nuclear**
To: Calpernia
LOL you back to that again. I will add the "s" for you.
Natural disasters happen, and hopefully people are aware, and can cope till help arrives. That is a taught reaction, it does not come easy to Americans.
As far as the statement, ask anyone in Florida (South) how many people, "friends or otherwise", how many people were having Hurricane Parties before Andrew hit.
It is just a fact, Americans like their play. Don't you?
Because I can sure find alot of neat, and awe inspiring things to do.
6,597 posted on
01/05/2004 10:09:00 AM PST by
Nemo1USA
(Endeavor to Enterprise I had the ambition to not only go farther than man had gone before but-)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson