[Merdoug]

Just some thoughts: A dirty nuke would not necessarily cause instant massive death; would it? And yet, we get the advisements for Muslims to get out of the cities. A dirty nuke would make these cities uninhabitable, in the future. It seems to me that the 9-11 attacks were aimed more at our economic structure than killing people: the world trade centers and the airlines. The warning to get out and the economic target just don't seem to mix.

[LayoutGuru2]

I agree, a dirty bomb or chemical attack would require you to be out of the neighborhood. A small nuke or a really nasty bioweapon would require vacating the city proper. Then again, if you specify a neighborhood you are giving away too much information about the nature and location of the attack.

I am not losing any sleep over all of this, but I am staying alert to it.

[oceanview]

this is another myth about a dirty bomb making the city "uninhabitable". Do you realize how many peoiple live in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

[WhiteTrashRepublic.com]

A "Death Blow?" Sounds like someone's been playing too much Mortal Kombat in the mosque computer room. Have no fear guys, Brad and Jennifer are heading over to straighten this all out.

And as Ann Coulter said, "I don't think Al Qaeda has the technology to cause a blackout. They don't even have chairs."