This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
Locked on 01/26/2004 2:00:53 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
The size of this thread is causing FR to slow down whenever it is accessed. It is going to be locked and moved to the chat/general interest forum. If anyone wants to post a ‘Part 2’ thread, go ahead, but post it to chat. Thank You http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1065689/posts
|
Skip to comments.
Al Qaeda again threatens New York, Washington and Los Angeles - Daily Terror Threat
Debka ^
| 11-3-2003
| Staff
Posted on 11/03/2003 9:17:27 AM PST by tubavil
Edited on 01/26/2004 3:58:09 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 4,061-4,080, 4,081-4,100, 4,101-4,120 ... 15,461-15,468 next last
To: Calpernia
ty sorry if late, still trying to understand how the posting on the site works, and so on. -g-
To: knak
look at that link again it starts at the top od Anaconda Range.
To: bonesmccoy
I appreciate your sober analysis as to the threats we face.
My only nit is with the following as the rest of your post is a well measured, thoughtful analysis.
My primary concern was that this thread is over-emphasizing the relative risk of being caught in a terror event.
If you take the whole of the USA and jumble in the 10s of thousands killed or injured during 9/11, this is indeed true.
If you take merely the number of people in Manhatten at the time, or folks like myself who watched it from across the Hudson, your percentage goes up significantly. If you were in WTC 1 or 2, your risk was 100%.
My mother and father live in small towns in Ohio. I work in southern Bergen county NJ, I travel into Manhatten on occasion. Who's risk is higher?
My point is that one needs to factor in proximity to high value targets to identify risk as best as possible. Calculating risk by using the population of the country or the world as a benchmark is disengenuous.
To: knak
An ongoing debate , DaDa stuff and some headlines -g- you'll just have to looksee wontchya? ;)
4,084
posted on
12/28/2003 11:13:07 AM PST
by
JustPiper
(Bush+Ridge=TagTeam for Amnesty! Write-In Tom Tancredo in March!!!)
To: Pegita
Amen!
And please God lead any of us here to be able to help in any forewarnings
4,085
posted on
12/28/2003 11:14:51 AM PST
by
JustPiper
(Bush+Ridge=TagTeam for Amnesty! Write-In Tom Tancredo in March!!!)
To: Nemo1USA; knak
Holy
Cr@p! Gadhafi armed al-Qaeda with germ bombs: report
London, Dec 28. (PTI): Libyan leader Maommar Gadhafi, who recently abandoned his country's weapons of mass destruction programme, had armed al-Qaeda terror network with germ bombs, a report claimed today.
I've never heard the term 'germ bomb' before?
4,086
posted on
12/28/2003 11:16:54 AM PST
by
JustPiper
(Bush+Ridge=TagTeam for Amnesty! Write-In Tom Tancredo in March!!!)
To: JustPiper
holy crap is right, gotta link?
4,087
posted on
12/28/2003 11:21:25 AM PST
by
knak
(wasknaknowknid)
4,088
posted on
12/28/2003 11:23:50 AM PST
by
JustPiper
(Bush+Ridge=TagTeam for Amnesty! Write-In Tom Tancredo in March!!!)
To: knak
4,089
posted on
12/28/2003 11:25:02 AM PST
by
JustPiper
(Bush+Ridge=TagTeam for Amnesty! Write-In Tom Tancredo in March!!!)
To: JustPiper
thanks, you post it on the front page?
4,090
posted on
12/28/2003 11:27:43 AM PST
by
knak
(wasknaknowknid)
To: JustPiper
4,091
posted on
12/28/2003 11:34:03 AM PST
by
knak
(wasknaknowknid)
To: tubavil
bump
To: knak
HI knak,
the link is at post#4080 I had answered the "snake" ? for you also, how do you post to front page? what is that?
thx
To: JustPiper; 2sheep; Indie; Sabertooth; Jeremiah Jr
and most disturbing, what appears to be an image in the lower right corner perhaps depicting a stadium with fire or flames coming from its center. I do not follow sports, but do know that the Super Bowl Sunday is shortly after the beginning of the year. How intriguing, that when I Googled it, I discovered that it is scheduled for just the date I suspected... February 1.
Furthermore, a search of "super bowl" and "back breaking" generated quite a few hits, in reference to touchdowns.
If the target isn't the superbowl, perhaps it's a metaphor for a success... a big score... a back-breaking touchdown. Looking down the links, I noticed that in game XXXI (1987), their was a super bowl record of a 99 yard touchdown. Can't go higher than that, can you, except maybe from Mars? The point is, allah has 99 names. Maybe Al Qaeda likes football-allah analogies. Of course, this is a long thread, so surely someone covered these points already. Sorry for any duplicate ideas here. Carry on...
To: Nemo1USA
just meant the main page. "Latest posts"
4,095
posted on
12/28/2003 11:41:43 AM PST
by
knak
(wasknaknowknid)
To: JustPiper; 2sheep; Indie; Sabertooth; Jeremiah Jr
Site: Reliant Stadium, Houston Texas
Date: Feb. 1, 2004
Game time: 5 p.m. CST
Bush country
To: knak
oh ty
can you tell me where to read about pings?, and bookmarks?
I see them all the time here is there a general help page?
thx in advance
typo. should be 1997, not 1987. I hate it when that happens.
To: All
To: Thinkin' Gal
Sunday, 1 February - EID-UL- ADHA (Day of Sacrifice)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 4,061-4,080, 4,081-4,100, 4,101-4,120 ... 15,461-15,468 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson