This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
Locked on 01/26/2004 2:00:53 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
The size of this thread is causing FR to slow down whenever it is accessed. It is going to be locked and moved to the chat/general interest forum. If anyone wants to post a ‘Part 2’ thread, go ahead, but post it to chat. Thank You http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1065689/posts
|
Skip to comments.
Al Qaeda again threatens New York, Washington and Los Angeles - Daily Terror Threat
Debka ^
| 11-3-2003
| Staff
Posted on 11/03/2003 9:17:27 AM PST by tubavil
Edited on 01/26/2004 3:58:09 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 6,521-6,540, 6,541-6,560, 6,561-6,580 ... 15,461-15,468 next last
To: Calpernia
www.reeldb.com
Registrant: Wacker, Andreas (REELDB2-DOM) co Method 1546 7th Street Suite # 200 Santa Monica, CA 90401 US
Ok, so what is this and why does it get it's own domain?
6,541
posted on
01/05/2004 8:34:23 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
To: JustPiper
...Many of the weapons used by al-Qaida and the Taliban in Afghanstan came from Chinese dealers...
I've been saying this all along.
Keep in mind, there are no chinese weapon dealers that are not sanctioned by their government.
6,542
posted on
01/05/2004 8:38:09 AM PST
by
the gillman@blacklagoon.com
(The only thing standing between the rule of law and anarchy is that conservatives are good losers!)
To: abbi_normal_2
I agree with your statement about going up in the long run, but would wait if there is going to "a situation" to catch it on the dip...
6,543
posted on
01/05/2004 8:39:10 AM PST
by
tmp02
To: Calpernia
Huh, I can't get the specific pics to come up just by going in straight from the www.reeldb.com directly.
But here is the google search:
Images: Sunday, January 4, 2004
... utkyuydsi8 aadadda famine, sevr5yvr unitpics akram logotipo camilla's foot bvmnmvbn
easyseries saxx> hello guys (19), chieu ro mot chut 53 physical torrie ...
www.reeldb.com/ - 57k - Jan 3, 2004 - Cached - Similar pages
6,544
posted on
01/05/2004 8:39:40 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
Carl Limbacher, NewsMax.com Reporter plays his bombshell audiotape of Former President Bill Clinton admitting he killed a deal for Osama bin Ladens capture Sunday Jan. 4, 2004; 11:43 p.m. EST
Clinton Administration Freed Bin Laden's Banker
A Saudi national known to investigators as Osama bin Laden's "banker" was apprehended inside the U.S. in 1994 - only to be set free by the Clinton administration in a decision that was considered a "massive loss" in the war on terrorism by U.S. intelligence officials.
Bin Laden brother-in-law Mohammed Jamal Khalifa was believed to be "the real money man" behind the scenes for the 9/11 mastermind, reports investigative journalist Peter Lance, in his comprehensive overview of the 9/11 attacks, "1,000 Years For Revenge: International Terrorism and the FBI."
The bin Laden relative was involved most intensively in bankrolling Ramzi Yousef, the operations chief for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, who conceived the plan later adopted by bin Laden to hijack airliners and fly them into the Twin Towers.
Convicted of murder in Jordan, Khalifa was picked up on a fraud rap by INS agents in San Francisco. Lance writes that at the time, Khalifa "was in the process of funding Yousef's Bojinka and Pope John Paul II assassination plots - even as Yousef was laying the groundwork for what became the 9/11 attacks."
Documents found on his person indicated that the bin Laden brother-in-law was a major cog in the global terror machine. Based on that evidence, the U.S. Attorney in San Francisco pushed to have him held for questioning.
But the Clinton State Department had other ideas. Reports Lance:
"Secretary of State Warren Christopher wrote to Attorney General Janet Reno on Jan. 5, 1995, arguing that 'to permit Mr. Khalifa to remain at large inside the United States in light of his alleged activities and criminal conviction in Jordan . . . . would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences.'"
"Of course," notes the author, "the U.S. Attorney in San Francisco wasn't asking for Khalifa to be released, merely held for questioning. Khalifa had traveled the world as Osama bin Laden's 'banker.' He was a potential intelligence gold mine."
Secretary Christopher, however, prevailed. Khalifa was deported to Jordan, where, at trial, the murder witness recanted. Bin Laden's banker was promptly set free.
U.S. counterterrorism officials were dumbfounded by the administration's decision to let Khalifa go. "Not even speaking in retrospect, but contemporaneous with what the intelligence community knew about bin Laden, Khalifa's deportation was unreal," CIA counterterrorism analyst Jacob L. Boesen told the author.
Concludes Lance: "In light of what we now know. . . Khalifa's release has to be considered one of the most grievous instances of negligence in the years leading up to 9/11."
Little more than a year after the Clinton administration let bin Laden's banker get away, President Clinton would personally turn down an offer for Osama bin Laden's arrest and extradition to the U.S. by Sudan
6,545
posted on
01/05/2004 8:39:43 AM PST
by
JustPiper
(Every government degenerates when trusted to our rulers alone)
To: tmp02
Didn't gold go up $10 in one day in the last couple months? I forget the reason for it but the big boys were doing something that caused the jump and then it went back down again. I seem to remember this happened...
To: Calpernia
I don't know but the guy's pants look like they were styled circa 1780.
6,547
posted on
01/05/2004 8:40:48 AM PST
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
To: abbi_normal_2
...what I mean by gold continuing to go up...I think that our economy is in bad shape even if there were no threats...I would go to the safe haven of gold...
6,548
posted on
01/05/2004 8:42:10 AM PST
by
tmp02
To: Calpernia
6,549
posted on
01/05/2004 8:42:11 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
To: StillProud2BeFree
6,550
posted on
01/05/2004 8:43:15 AM PST
by
JustPiper
(Every government degenerates when trusted to our rulers alone)
To: StillProud2BeFree
6,551
posted on
01/05/2004 8:43:26 AM PST
by
JustPiper
(Every government degenerates when trusted to our rulers alone)
To: abbi_normal_2
It may have occured during a 24 hour day, usually at night time or non-trading hours in US...but I don't think (correct me if I'm wrong) that it had shot up this high during regular trading hours...but again, I may be wrong
6,552
posted on
01/05/2004 8:45:45 AM PST
by
tmp02
To: abbi_normal_2
Here we go, back down again. The PPT is working it's magic again. Gold headed back down, now has dropped $3. It seems every time gold gets on a roll "someone" gets busy and drives it back down. I don't think this is a panic about gold day. Just my opinion. Well, back to work for me.
To: Calpernia
Ok, so what is this and why does it get it's own domain?An ad for Abercrombie & Fitch?
6,554
posted on
01/05/2004 8:47:45 AM PST
by
mhking
(My brother and I had never seen The Belt........but we had heard about it....)
To: MeeknMing
What? Something slipped past you? Noooooo!!! ;)
6,555
posted on
01/05/2004 8:47:50 AM PST
by
JustPiper
(Every government degenerates when trusted to our rulers alone)
To: Calpernia
Aren't these just randomly generated images as stated on the site? Or are you finding otherwise?
To: Velveeta
Aren't these just randomly generated images as stated on the site? Or are you finding otherwise?There are strong suggestions (I won't go as far as to use the term "evidence") that this is beyond the notion of a random incident.
6,557
posted on
01/05/2004 8:52:06 AM PST
by
mhking
(My brother and I had never seen The Belt........but we had heard about it....)
To: JustPiper
That needs it's own thread JP.
6,558
posted on
01/05/2004 8:53:20 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
To: mhking
It is? Ok, that's good. I was wondering why that had it's own domain. Thanks MH.
6,559
posted on
01/05/2004 8:55:48 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
To: mhking
Thanks for the reply. Seems to be over my head at the moment, but I'll keep an eye out as well.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 6,521-6,540, 6,541-6,560, 6,561-6,580 ... 15,461-15,468 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson