I had a lot of doubts about his guilt initially, and thought the legal argument for searching his house without a warrant was extremely weak -- which should have then excluded a good deal of the evidence that was used in the case. I really didn't follow the case closely, but guess the blood evidence should have been pretty damning (although I would have expected MUCH more blood to be present in the vehicle if he committed such a brutally violent murder and then drove away)
I think he probably did it, but don't have a really strong feeling either way.
yes all the amateur legal minds were sifting and weighing the OJ case! everyone wanted to be a lawyer then ; )