Posted on 10/02/2026 6:49:39 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Lindsay Clancy was back in court Tuesday, and her attorney Kevin Reddington is prepared to try anything to keep his client — a mother of three who admitted to killing her children — from seeing the inside of a prison cell. In September, Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial when a lone juror — 48-year-old Michael Desronvil — refused to concede to his peers during deliberations. Desronvil, a Christian father, was not prepared to let Clancy off from the murder charges she faced.
Reddington was not happy. According to KSWO-TV, he asked Sullivan to investigate Desronvil after the trial. People magazine also reported comments by the attorney saying that Desronvil had “robbed” his client and the other jurors. Desronvil found Reddington’s conduct so egregious that his counsel announced plans to file a bar complaint in an interview with Fox News’ Kayleigh McEnany.
Excerpt - Video at link
(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournal.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
n a sane world Reddington would be disbarred going after a juror like that.
So this is Reddington’s shot at fame and fortune. This case will get him a large advance on a book deal, lots of post case interviews and depending on the outcome possibly a made for tv film or limited netflix series, the more he struggles “against the system” the better it looks for producers.
And there it is...
You’re right about that. This amoral yayhoo will make serious bank on his unhinged conduct, and he knows it. It is his prime motivation, one can be sure.
This Reddington performance is not free. Someone is paying his “fees”. Doubt its Lindsey Clancy.
The AG in my state woulda denutted that jagoff weeks ago.
Yep, the mask has slipped and what we suspected all along has now been confirmed.
Severe TDS should be treated with long-term institutionalization.
will probably be dis=barred for such outrage
Yep.
Yup.
Here’s hoping.
In CA, at least, disciplined, not disbarred. I can’t imagine the MA bar would be more stringent than that
This, so-called, lawyer needs to be disbarred immediately.
It’s only “out of control” in a normal venue.
In MA, before a MA leftist judge and MA leftist DA, it’s smart lawyering.
Hey, when you’ve reached peak hatred, you never know what’s going to happen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.