Posted on 06/03/2026 6:17:15 AM PDT by DFG
Here’s another painful reminder to never follow the leftists who smugly told us to “follow the science”: The Democratic Party of Wisconsin can’t seem to tell a cow from a bull.
That’s not only embarrassing in America’s Dairyland, such confusion during milking could prove fatal.
In a now-deleted social media post, the party welcomed National Dairy Month with an image of wispy white clouds, blues skies, and two beefy bulls. As others in my beloved purple home state have helpfully pointed out, you can’t milk a bull. And, again, pity the fool who tries.
Actually, the mistake is quite fitting for a pronoun-happy party that likes to refer to moms as “inseminated persons” and pretend dudes can birth babies. But this is taking Pride Month a bit too far.
“Wisconsin Dems are so out-of-touch that they actually tweeted a pic of bulls for dairy month. I mean, it’s also pride month, so I guess they were gender-confused about the cattle too,” my old pal and former state Republican lawmaker Adam Jarchow posted on the Wisconsin Democrats’ lactose intolerant correction.
“I regret to inform @WisDems that you cannot milk a bull,” Rep. Tom Tiffany, a Republican who serves Wisconsin’s 7th Congressional District and is running for governor of the Dairyland, wrote on X. “But considering they think men can get pregnant, I guess thinking you can milk a bull tracks too.”
Tiffany, to be sure, has some expertise on the subject. He grew up milking cows — never bulls — on his Wisconsin family farm. But then again, as the genius Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson might say, not everyone is a biologist.
The cow kerfuffle should come as no surprise. Wisconsin’s Dem political machine isn’t much acquainted with your average family farmer, nor all that interested. The Democratic Party of Wisconsin, in fact, has had a great deal of success in statewide elections over the better part of the last decade by ignoring the interests of rural Wisconsinites and focusing almost exclusively on the woke and whipped “progressives” populating the state’s population centers, Milwaukee and Madison.
And in that bubbled universe, unlike down on the farm, girls will be boys and boys will be girls. It’s a mixed up, muddled, shook up world. As the good folks at The Heartland Post noted, “this is the same political party whose leaders have spent years insisting that biological sex is little more than a social construct and pushing policies that allow men to compete in women’s sports.”
It’s the same party that brought Wisconsin pasty, white progressive Tony Evers, the state’s two-term governor created in the liberal lab of public school bureaucracy.
And Evers brought to the party Clearinghouse Rule 25-004 , which redefines, among other gender-specific terms, “pregnant women” as “pregnant persons” in a forced administrative rule. The language swap trades “Pregnant woman” for “pregnant member(s).”
Evers’ proposed state budget last year demanded portions of Wisconsin statute refer to mothers as “inseminated persons” or “parent who gave birth to the child.” Removed from the budget by majority Republicans in the legislature, the proposal made Wisconsin the butt of a litany of jokes.
Dads suffered a similar fate under the rule. The term “father” was replaced with “other parent.”
After Evers announced he wouldn’t seek a third term as governor, I predicted the leftist would go out with a socialist bang. I’m still laying bets on Evers establishing a “Gender-Affirming Care” wing at the State Capitol, with “Testicle Tuesday” (20% off orchiectomies) and 24/7 unisex high school showers, upon departing.
Wisconsin has a chance to kick this kind of crazy to the curb come November (Sadly, the liberals running to replace Evers are left of the Castro brothers.). Normal, sane Wisconsinites have endured a lot over the last seven-plus years of executive branch leftism.
Perhaps America’s Dairyland has finally had enough of the Democrats’ B.S.
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Ping!....................
They’re full of BULL
Aren’t they supposed to be saying “Eat Mor Chikin” or something like that?
This actually IS a big blunder. I lived in Wisconsin. Dairy is a big thing. It is the only place I know where you get butter in a Kentucky Fried Chicken because there is a LAW that says that butter has to be the default.
The only place I saw it ignored was the Wisconsin DOT cafeteria.
Dumbass Democrat - This transcow milk tatstes funny.....
How does a Woke Democrat tell the difference between a bull and a cow in the dark?
Butter has to be the default what? I want to know more about why get and why you need butter with a piece of chicken, and what this has to do with state law.
Sounds like they never actually herd of cattle.
If they milk it they’ll have a friend for life..............
The post was deleted, sounds like the perps are trying to *steer* the conversation away from the gaffe.
It was remoooooved?...............
I've got a buddy, Cal Ostrom, I'll see if he knows.
Proof that the dem party is run by low IQ know nothings.
One of my brothers-in-law raises a few cattle every year in his barn. I asked him a few years ago how many cows he that year. He said he didn't have any, but he had two heifers and a steer.
OK, but to city-slicker me they all look like cows.
I would like to see those dems try to milk that cow.
For the biscuits. The dairy industry is so powerful in MN that restaurants must offer real butter as the default in their condiment selection.
I am not that familiar with the law but my guess is if you ask for butter for your biscuits they have to give you better rather than margarine.
Correct.
Big time.
And they insist on telling everyone else what to think and do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.