Chad Bianco Should Drop Out and Endorse Steve Hilton

Chad Bianco is a good sheriff and, by most honest measures, a good man. He stared down Gavin Newsom’s lockdown regime when it took real courage to do so, and he built a following on the strength of that conviction. None of that is in dispute here. What is in dispute is arithmetic, and arithmetic does not care how brave you are.

The Riverside County sheriff cannot become governor of California. The polling has been consistent across every reputable survey for months, and it has only hardened as the June primary closes in. The final Emerson College survey, conducted May 27 and 28, put Democrat Xavier Becerra at 28 percent, fellow Democrat Tom Steyer at 22 percent, Steve Hilton in third, and Bianco languishing near 12. The Berkeley IGS poll co-sponsored by the Los Angeles Times told the same story: Becerra 25, Hilton 21, Steyer 19, Bianco at 11 and falling. The Public Policy Institute of California found the identical pecking order. Five different pollsters, one conclusion.

Here is the part that should concentrate the mind of every California Republican. Under the state’s top-two jungle primary, the two highest vote-getters advance to November regardless of party. In the most recent numbers, those two slots belong to Becerra and Steyer.

Two Democrats. No Republican on the November ballot at all. This is not a worst-case hypothetical dredged up to frighten donors. It is the current trajectory, plotted in black and white by the people who count these things for a living.

Why is a Republican-free general election even possible in a year when conservatives are energized? Because two Republicans are dividing a single pool of Republican voters. PPIC found GOP voters splitting 53 percent for Hilton and 33 percent for Bianco. Earlier Emerson polling had it closer, 48 to 40. The exact ratio matters less than the principle: every point Bianco holds is a point Hilton does not have, and Hilton is the only Republican with a mathematical path to the top two.

Consolidate even half of Bianco’s support behind the lone viable Republican and Hilton clears second place comfortably, perhaps even challenges Becerra for first. Leave it divided and Steyer, a billionaire who can write his campaign a check for whatever it costs, glides into November against a fellow Democrat while Republicans watch from the parking lot.

Hilton has said as much, and so, revealingly, has Newsom. The governor recently admitted to a “break the glass” contingency to keep Republicans out of the top two.

Bianco’s response to the pressure has been to insist that Hilton is the one who cannot win, that Newsom is propping Hilton up precisely because a one-on-one with the former Fox host guarantees a Democratic victory. It is not a frivolous argument. Hilton’s ceiling in deep-blue California is a fair question, and Bianco’s supporters are devoted, with the final Emerson poll showing 88 percent of them locked in. But the argument collides with a wall the sheriff cannot talk his way around. Whatever Hilton’s November ceiling, Bianco’s June floor is lower. You cannot win the second round if you do not survive the first, and only one Republican is positioned to survive it.

There is a season for everything, Scripture reminds us, and a time to every purpose under heaven. A time to plant and a time to pluck up that which is planted. Bianco planted something real in 2020 when he refused to enforce Newsom’s edicts. The harvest from that season was genuine. But the season for a Bianco governorship has not arrived, and pretending otherwise does not bend the calendar. It only ensures that the field is plucked clean of Republicans before the real planting can begin.

The cruelest detail is that the cleanest moment to act has already slipped past. When Trump endorsed Hilton over a month ago, that was the window for a graceful exit and a unifying endorsement. Now ballots are printed with Bianco’s name and votes are already being cast, which means even a withdrawal today cannot fully transfer his support. The longer the decision waits, the less good it can do, which is its own argument for making it without further delay.

The damage would not stop at the governor’s mansion. California Republicans are defending themselves on a map redrawn explicitly to bury them. Proposition 50, ratified by voters last November in retaliation for redistricting in Texas, handed Democrats the advantage in five of the nine House seats the GOP currently holds in the state. Analysts expect the new lines to net Democrats three to five additional congressional seats. Several of those districts, in the Central Valley and around San Diego, sit on national watchlists as among the closest in the country.

Close races are decided at the margins, and nothing shapes the margin like turnout. When there is no Republican atop the ticket, the casual conservative voter who shows up mainly to vote for governor has one less reason to mail in a ballot at all.

That depressed turnout does not stay neatly contained in the gubernatorial line. It bleeds down into House races the party could otherwise win, into Assembly and state Senate contests, into the ballot initiatives where California Republicans have occasionally clawed back ground even in losing years. An all-Democrat marquee race is not merely a symbolic humiliation. It is a turnout suppressant administered to the entire Republican ballot, in the exact cycle when control of Congress may run through these very districts.

Hilton put the plea plainly: a vote for Bianco is a vote for two Democrats in the top two, and the power to prevent that rests in one man’s hands. The framing is self-serving, of course, because Hilton benefits. That does not make it false. Two things can be true at once. The messenger has an interest, and the message is still correct.

The Apostle Paul wrote to the Philippians that nothing should be done through strife or vainglory, but that each should in lowliness of mind esteem others better than themselves, looking not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others.

That is a hard word for any man who has campaigned, raised money, earned endorsements, and built a movement around his own name. Stepping aside earns no rally, no victory speech, no statue. It is the quiet, thankless kind of sacrifice that the cameras never capture.

Yet it remains the most consequential thing Chad Bianco could do for the state he says he loves. He cannot win. He has known it for weeks, even as he disputes it. The only open question is whether his refusal to face that fact will be remembered as principled defiance or as the vanity that handed California, top to bottom, to the very people he spent his career resisting.

The honorable move and the winning move are, for once, the same move. It just happens to be the one that costs him everything and returns him nothing but the knowledge that he did right.

I believe that Bianco’s name cannot be removed from the ballot at this point and that his endorsement of Hilton *might* get Hilton the #2 spot in the primary, but only if Bianco voters show up and cast their vote for Hilton. There will definitely be diminishing returns, there.

I would love to see Hilton come in second. It would give him a platform to speak from until November and possibly set him up for further goals - but let’s face it - the Democrat machinery has gotten behind Becerra, so he is guaranteed a spot in the November runoff and there is NO WAY a Republican is going to win that race. I’d almost like to see Becerra and Steyer waste hundreds of millions trashing each other.

Nope. California is too far gone. It’s a situation where California, like most people will get what it deserves. I voted for Bianco hoping he’d finish 2nd to Hilton thereby assuring a gop victory in November. It appears too late. If the democrats can still finish 1-2 with all those candidates we’ve got nowhere to go unless a Spencer Pratt victory in LA has coattails. A bridge too far.

If Bianco were to take out a TV ad in CA and openly and loudly throw his support to Steve H that would be the best that he could do for CA.

Should have been done before they printed up the ballots, but it still would help.

I hope he sees the light.

California has become a mere shell of what it once was, a once commanding economy destroyed almost as thoroughly as that of Venezuela, and for similar reasons. And the eventual cure may have to be as drastic as that “solution” as applied to Nicolás Maduro.

I understand the sentiment for wanting a strong unifying candidate, but the GOP should not be the party of forcing anyone to drop out. Bianco can drop out if he makes the decision to drop out. Otherwise, the voters can decide. The Republicans should never be the party of backroom deals. It may work once or twice in the short term, but in the long run, it destroys a party.

6 posted on 06/01/2026 6:23:55 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard (When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)

"The Berkeley IGS poll co-sponsored by the Los Angeles Times..." 🙂😊😁😀😃😆😅😂🤣

Bianco needs to go after Becerra, and Hilton needs to endorse Pratt, if he hasn't already.

**And the eventual cure may have to be as drastic as that “solution” as applied to Nicolás Maduro.**

Nope. An earthquake or tsunami. In other words an act of god. I’d hate to think of all the sewage coming in from Tijuana. Let’s say democrats win and just don’t get it. The big overdue earthquake hits and California is devastated. What does Trump owe the state other than medical attention?

The election is tomorrow , and millions of people have already voted early, or voted by mail.

It’s a little late for somebody to be talking about someone dropping out. Ballots were printed up long ago.

Heck, even the disgraced Eric Swalwell still remained on the ballot, even though he officially withdrew.

I like the idea of Becerra and Steyr wasting money the Dems would otherwise use in other races. But...

Conventional wisdom finds value in having a Republican candidate in the general election: Supports downticket races; shows refusal to accept a one-party State; potentially builds momentum for future races; potentially undermines Becerra’s claim to a mandate. Then there is the slim hope that a scandal, health emergency, or unforeseen events would derail Becerra before November.

The Republicans should never be the party of backroom deals. It may work once or twice in the short term, but in the long run, it destroys a party.

This has resulted in EVERY statewide office being held by rats.

Dems suck, but they know how to get to the levers of power.

13 posted on 06/01/2026 10:14:39 AM PDT by Red Badger (Iryna Zarutska, May 22, 2002 Kyiv, Ukraine – August 22, 2025 Charlotte, North Carolina Say her name)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.